Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best Drop Rates for Receivers last year


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Honestly, Funchess really doesn't belong on that list of who's who at wide receiver in the NFL. 

Not yet anyway. I think he has a lot of potential, but right now he's not on the same level of any of those receivers sans maybe Micheal Thomas. 

Why?  They use the same formula.  Because he is younger?  

He's on that list because he deserves to be.  Dropping him off it because he hasn't reached his ceiling is a weak argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Why?  They use the same formula.  Because he is younger?  

He's on that list because he deserves to be.  Dropping him off it because he hasn't reached his ceiling is a weak argument.

You're right. He made the list and I'm not arguing that point. However,  that list would lead you to believe he's in the top echelon of receivers right now. He is not. Going out on a limb, but he's probably the least recognizable name on that list - and for good reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

You're right. He made the list and I'm not arguing that point. However,  that list would lead you to believe he's in the top echelon of receivers right now. He is not. Going out on a limb, but he's probably the least recognizable name on that list - and for good reason.

The list simply shows the status of him having a low drop rate. It's not a list of anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2018 at 8:44 AM, Peppers90 NC said:

When you consider that was probably the worst crop of WRs to ever suit up for a playoff game, they played decent. Cam outplayed Drew, we were just a few plays away from taking that game. After that game I felt similar to the way I felt after losing in the playoffs to Seattle in the 14' season, thinking about the upcoming season. I think we surprise everyone again this year, but the offense leading the way more so than the defense.

Where exactly? Pregame warmups?

Brees: 23/33, 69.7 completion %, 376 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 1 sack, 3/3 in redzone efficiency, 3/3 in goal-to-go efficiency

Newton: 24/40, 60.0 completion %, 349 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 4 sacks, 1/4 in redzone efficiency, 0/1 in goal-to-go efficiency

Better in literally one passing category and that's only because of a pick on 4th down inside the 2 minute warning which was essentially a punt. LOLOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Iron Saint said:

Where exactly? Pregame warmups?

Brees: 23/33, 69.7 completion %, 376 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 1 sack, 3/3 in redzone efficiency, 3/3 in goal-to-go efficiency

Newton: 24/40, 60.0 completion %, 349 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 4 sacks, 1/4 in redzone efficiency, 0/1 in goal-to-go efficiency

Better in literally one passing category and that's only because of a pick on 4th down inside the 2 minute warning which was essentially a punt. LOLOL.

they both played fine and well enough to win

funchess doesn't alligator arm a ball and the panthers win the game

stupid trying to compare brees and cam's stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iron Saint said:

Where exactly? Pregame warmups?

Brees: 23/33, 69.7 completion %, 376 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 1 sack, 3/3 in redzone efficiency, 3/3 in goal-to-go efficiency

Newton: 24/40, 60.0 completion %, 349 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 4 sacks, 1/4 in redzone efficiency, 0/1 in goal-to-go efficiency

Better in literally one passing category and that's only because of a pick on 4th down inside the 2 minute warning which was essentially a punt. LOLOL.

Did you see all the dropped balls from Panthers' receivers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2018 at 11:27 PM, Iron Saint said:

Where exactly? Pregame warmups?

Brees: 23/33, 69.7 completion %, 376 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 1 sack, 3/3 in redzone efficiency, 3/3 in goal-to-go efficiency

Newton: 24/40, 60.0 completion %, 349 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 4 sacks, 1/4 in redzone efficiency, 0/1 in goal-to-go efficiency

Better in literally one passing category and that's only because of a pick on 4th down inside the 2 minute warning which was essentially a punt. LOLOL.

unbiased eye-test guy. any schmuck can reel off a stat sheet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...