Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kuechly praises Poe, essentially gives nod over Star


top dawg

Recommended Posts

In an interview with Alex Marvez and Gil Brandt, reading between the lines, Luke Kuechly basically said that Dontari Poe is an upgrade over Star Lotulelei without expressly saying it.

 

"This offseason we lost Star and everyone was kind of like, We’re going to miss him. . . And then you plug a guy like Dontari in and you don’t miss a beat. Dontari’s big, he’s physical, he takes up space. But he’s also very athletic. He’s nimble on his feet, he moves really well. For as big as he is, it’s pretty interesting."

 

When Poe was signed, I believe that basically all of the Huddle believed that Poe was an upgrade. On paper, Poe is an upgrade, but I would think that Luke's knowledge of the game and his eyes are speaking  to what he has seen/is seeing.

I know that Luke didn't come out and say that Poe is better than Star, but he said more than what everyone else has said (and probably what everyone is thinking).

Poe is looking good, and we should feel very grateful to have him...at a pretty good bargain, at that.

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/08/08/luke-kuechly-comments-on-dontari-poe-replacing-star-lotulelei/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you want, but at the very least you have to admit that Luke is basically saying, "No, we're not going to miss Star."

I think the praise of Poe's athleticism and nimbleness of foot is saying more, but to each his own.

And BTW, it's no controversy, it is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

poe also has a problematic lower back.

Fortunately he has been pretty durable since returning from a surgery in the Summer of 15. He missed some starts and the first several games but was active. He then missed a  game middle of 15 due to an ankle but has starred every game since. It's caused him to miss some practice and a half a game in 2016. Hopefully that trend continues and it doesn't progress past occasional nagging. 

I'd be more concerned about Lukes head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I always thought Star went through the motions for the money. 

I never saw a great love of the game from him

just my observation from watching him every Sunday 

Gettleman’s first round picks not impressive 

Can’t blame star on gman... everyone thought this was the best unanimous pick. The huddle all agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So... what metrics for production do you believe display these issues/limitations best? Are we only using total passing yards, height, and weight thresholds? If so, then what are those thresholds?
    • I mean as far as his size goes it's all over his tape bouncing up and down on his toes in and around the pocket trying to see the field and defenses know this as well as we do but if folks here want to live in never never land and pretend it's not a thing that's their prerogative. Even our head coach has made it a key focal point to get his footwork under control. But it's still something Bryce is going to be tested on early and often no matter how many keystrokes anyone here commits to the narrative it isn't an issue.
    • It speaks volumes that when asked to define a clear performance threshold the responses instead fixate on Bryce's size. It reinforces what’s been clear for a while now... that for some, it has never been nor will it ever be about production. Any struggles will always be chalked up to his frame, and any strong play will be downplayed or disqualified via highly mobile goalposts.
×
×
  • Create New...