Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OT: "Darnold's Debut was Amazing!" - ESPN


CPcavedweller

Recommended Posts

15-21 for 121 yards, 1 TD and 1 Interception. 5.7 yards per attempt.

Tell me any other quarterback that has received a review of "amazing" for that stat line. It's almost as if he were an UDFA and he was just picked up off the street yesterday. Dude was the 3rd pick in the draft, that line isn't amazing, it should be expected that he could and would do better.

I like his poise and his footwork but his pick 6 was terrible, their first TD drive was helped along by a BS called catch (and reviewed) on a 3rd down in the red zone. The ground obviously helped him gain possession of the ball. 

All in all, I think it's a complete exaggeration of how mediocre his performance was. The only question I have is why? Why would they give him such a stellar review for a well below average stat line and relative performance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ignore the stat line. The kid started out with a pick 6 first play and instead of doing a Nathan Peterman he rebounded and played damn near perfect football from there on out. D and Stafford sucking helped them but I thought it was a very impressive showing for the youngest QB to start game 1 in nearly half a century.,.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

15-21 for 121 yards, 1 TD and 1 Interception. 5.7 yards per attempt.

Tell me any other quarterback that has received a review of "amazing" for that stat line. It's almost as if he were an UDFA and he was just picked up off the street yesterday. Dude was the 3rd pick in the draft, that line isn't amazing, it should be expected that he could and would do better.

I like his poise and his footwork but his pick 6 was terrible, their first TD drive was helped along by a BS called catch (and reviewed) on a 3rd down in the red zone. The ground obviously helped him gain possession of the ball. 

All in all, I think it's a complete exaggeration of how mediocre his performance was. The only question I have is why? Why would they give him such a stellar review for a well below average stat line and relative performance?

Stat line is wrong too he had 198 yards and 2 TDs (one of which was an absolutely beautiful pass to Robby Anderson).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnold did well. Yes he threw a pick 6 in his first throw but afterwards he only missed 4 passes. 

 

He had 2 TDs, high completion percentage. Sure he didn’t have a lot of yards but considering they ran the ball a lot you can’t expect him to have a lot of pass attempts.

 

 

also the Jets have a horrible offensive line. If people on here want to always give Cam excuses because of his offensive line shouldn’t Darnold as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good news is that we are pretty uniquely well established to address all of our needs this season. We have $14m real cap space, and something like $40m in trade deadline cap space. Not sure exactly how that works out. But, we have the room to absorb any bad contracts. With recent rule changes regarding retention, that went into effect this season, we now have a huge advantage in the trade market.  On top of that, while we do have obvious needs, we also have a glut of talent in certain areas that we struggle to find ice time for. We are over-stocked on scrappy talented lil-guys, strong defensively sound 3rd liners and shutdown left shot dmen. Whether it's a package or separate deals, idk. But, one of each from Stank/Blake/Nads, Erob/Carrier/KK/Jank, and Walker/Nystrom; throw in some 1st round picks (and frankly any other prospects they want) and we should be able to come out with a 1b to pair with Bussi and either a 2c with size or a 2c and size.   TL/DR We got the money, you got the stuff?
    • I don’t  think 6’4 was ever considered small or undersized. Baby hands tho, yes that was his thing That’s an interesting idea, like an optical illusion? Sounds like you have personal experience with this! 
    • in the 25' draft the Carolina Panthers had hired Brandt Tillis someone who actually understood how to build a successful team & build through the draft .  this team was yes mismanaged for years prior to Brandt Tillis joining the team in 25' & rarely done anything right in the draft outside occaionaly getting lucky on an UDFA such as Jalen Coker who's dad coincidentally happened to be a huge Carolina Panthers fan, hint hint  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...