Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We didn't lose because of Cam, Luke, or Coaching


TN05

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, TN05 said:

We lost because we made mistakes early. That's it. You don't win against Alex Smith when you go down 17-0. Alex Smith doesn't make mistakes that let you come back very often. The fact of the matter is, if DJ Moore doesn't fumble twice we win, and we nearly won even with that.

We had three turnovers and only allowed 23 points. That's not bad. We had three drives in the second half and scored on two of them and nearly on the third. That's about as good as you can get. The sky isn't falling. We just have to stop turning the ball over.

Does this mean there's no issues with coaching or performance? Of course not. We should have went for it on fourth and one. We should have been more aggressive early. Eric Reid shouldn't have blown coverage. Curtis Samuel and CJ Anderson should have had more time. But that's not why we lost: we lost because of turnovers. And that's fixable.

Turnovers happen, some times in bunches.  Great teams overcome them.  We didn't yesterday, against a less than average team.  The talent is there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RumHam said:

I love when the "understanding" and acceptance posts come a day after a L.

I find that no one ever talks about understanding and acceptance when they are 'winning'.

BTW, did you look at these forums after our win over the Giants?

There are detractors on this forum win or loose..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, the turnovers were the main culprit. But our defense's inability to get off the field meant our offense had little opportunity to answer or get in a rhythm. They spent the majority of the game on the sidelines. Then for some reason when we got in the redzone late with plenty of time and two timeouts we were focused only on the endzone and not on moving the sticks, whether that was Cam, the play calling, or a combo of both.

I'm sure Rivera loved the Redskins philosophy. Basically what he wants to do every week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    Earlier in Cam's career, we were like 1-16 when we had a single TO. But for some reason. Because we almost won yesterday, after having 3 TOs, it is worse case scenario? You folks are a hoot.

 

    95% of teams lose when committing 3 TOs. But all hellz breaks loose because we lost in that exact same instance.

 

    It is really difficult to win on the road in the NFL. 

 

    But rabble, rabble. fire everyone. Let's start that rebuild. Because evidently. Panther fans deserve better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you said.  You recognized that there were multiple contributing factors, i.e. coaching and player performance issues also, but pointed out that the 3 turnover were the major factors. Yeah if we score and win on the last drive, we would have over come the turnovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you win or lose for lots of reasons...

but we most definitely could of won with better play from Cam or play calling on that final series at the goal.  2 low percentage throws to the back corner back to back was simply.....dumb.  We had 2 timeouts and time. 

that matters.  That is why you have a big time QB.  For when you are in position late to win.  A million plays gets you to where you get in a game.  They all matter.   I can live with not winning.  Hard to swallow what Carolina opted to down there with the game on the line and not complain IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But... I need to blame this on just Ron Rivera so I can justify my irrationally hating a coach who has been in the top 5 for overall wins over the last 5 years!!!!!

(goes on to ignore everything and hone in on not going for it on 4th down when the score is 0-0 and it was the first possession of the game)

#huddlegonnahuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the game is as close as this one was, everything you did wrong is the reason you lost. DJ Moore hanging on to the football would have won this game. Better pass protection would have won this game. A more accurate pass from Newton to CMC in the end zone would have won this game. The defense not jumping offsides on a couple key third downs probably would have won this game. And, yes, better decisions from the coaching staff would have won this game. I'm no doom-and-gloomer, nor am I on the fire Rivera train, but he deserves criticism for his poor choices in this game just as Moore deserves to be criticized for fumbling twice.

Going for it on 4th and 1 is a better choice than punting unless you're backed up deep in your own end of the field. That's not an opinion; it's a statistical fact that better outcomes are generate more often by going for it. And it's just as true on the first possession of the game as it is on the last possession of the game (in fact, it's more true at the beginning of the game because there are some late-game time/score scenarios that can tip the scales towards punting). This also wasn't Rivera's only bad decision of the day. By deciding to just run it up the middle twice when we got the ball back with almost 2 minutes left in the first half, Rivera not only wasted another possession but also handed the ball back to Washington in scoring range. We were very lucky they didn't get another FG at the end of the half. When you voluntarily give up on possessions, you leave your players with less margin for error and magnify the impact of their mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...