Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would Tepper ever change the mascot, logo, and jerseys?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

It's no secret, the Panthers literally have the unluckiest mascot in the world: a black cat. This legitimately begs the question if the mascot has been a bad omen and negatively affected the performance of this team over the years. The Panthers are like Icarus, falling back down to earth whenever they fly too close to the sun, only to drown in the ocean.

Would Tepper ever consider changing this mascot to something that doesn't represent unluckiness and bad omens? I honestly would support it. It would give me one less reason to justify why this team is so consistently disappointing. What would you call the team? Maybe we could just change the cat logo from black to blue or white or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see him changing the jerseys but the mascot is too recognizable to the public to have it go away, didn't it win some award recently for best mascot or something?  if he got rid of it they'd basically have to change the whole team name and completely rebadge.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dunn said:

I could see him changing the jerseys but the mascot is too recognizable to the public to have it go away, didn't it win some award recently for best mascot or something?  if he got rid of it they'd basically have to change the whole team name and completely rebadge.  

The Panthers all-black alternates did win best uniform of all time on an NFL.com poll because Dave Damesheck is a douche bag and said the Panthers suck or something so it mobilized Panther nation to create a bunch of bots that voted 5 million times to win the poll. He didn't announce a winner and never spoke of it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jerseys probably. As for the rest, you're way overthinking things.

On the mascot or logo, why would he make such drastic changes if they aren't necessary for a franchise he just paid billions for? Especially when he could just clean house in the front office and bring in a fresh vibrant innovative staff. Winning does a hell of a lot more than a logo or a mascot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A black cat logo is the cause of this team's poor performance?

Why stop there?  Maybe a witch burning, a virgin sacrifice or perhaps a Commissioner Goodell voodoo doll might improve our fortunes?

In reality the cause is much less mysterious than the OP suggests, look no further than inept ownership, management and coaching for the Panthers organization's inability to build a winning tradition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...