Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gronkowski is a moron


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, PanthersBigD said:

Jesus, the neckbeard is strong in this thread. Gronkowski is a literal moron, but he shouldn't get a pass for it. It was an idiotic thing to say, staged or not. Barstool Sports is for LCD 'sports fans,' so it's unsurprising they were involved. 

Very strong and red as well lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

DailyMail is the British version of the National Enquirer. I'd be ashamed to link one of their stories.

False.

While it's a generally horrible conservative paper, it is Britain's second largest news paper. 

Also don't try and link to it being referred to as a tabloid style newspaper to prove me wrong. That refers to it's page layout and size, not it's content. The national enquire equivalent that you're referring to is the daily star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a Patriots player and they always get a slap on the wrist and told not to do that again. If it was any other team with a player that had said that he would be crucified instantly. We all know the media darling Pats team never do any wrongs because they are perfect citizens on the football field. He wont get anything but a stern talking to by BB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gronk is a stereotypical meathead who plays up the stereotypical meathead stereotype.

But, I think he's a little smarter than most give him credit for being, at least financially. It's widely reported that he hasn't touched a dime of his NFL earnings. Doesn't sound like he's going to be one of the many athletes who are flat broke a few years after they retire from professional sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Dude, this is so ridiculous. He answered that question to a Barstool employee he knew, and then made that reference to the person beside him, which was a woman. This question was baited. What's funny is the article is completely wrong about the topic of the question.

 

The Barstool employee(who was dressed up and pretending to be a 1st grade teacher) asked the 69 question as a joke. The video is on Barstool's instagram page. The entire thing was a setup for a joke.

 

 

Came in here to post the same thing. Was nice to see it was one of the first responses.

People are fuging soft and the media is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Floppin said:

False.

While it's a generally horrible conservative paper, it is Britain's second largest news paper. 

Also don't try and link to it being referred to as a tabloid style newspaper to prove me wrong. That refers to it's page layout and size, not it's content. The national enquire equivalent that you're referring to is the daily star.

The Daily Mail is a tabloid of the highest order and has an extremely long track record of paying libel awards to subjects of false stories they have printed.

In fact, Wikipedia has deemed the Daily Mail to be an "unreliable source" and except under extraordinary circumstances has banned the Daily Mail as a source: 

" The editors said the vote in favor of the ban stemmed from the website’s “reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism and flat-out fabrication."

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/wikipedia-bans-editors-from-citing-daily-mail-as-source

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Icege said:

Strangely enough, most of the bitching I have seen has been done by broflakes screaming about PC/outrage "culture" 

Like Gronkowski they arent known go br intelligent people. Look at the guy who came in here bringing uo the Gillette commercial. Face Palm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Outside of cerrato, I do like our draft overall. Hard to get can't miss draft picks when you pick late in the draft
    • Very True--and I am a former HS English teacher.  
    • Not a Moore fan-but he had a few good games last year-but I want players that scare you--Renfrow's route running and intelligence, Legette's size, speed, and strength, AT's intelligence and route running, Coker's body control, strong hands, and abilty to win contested catches, and TMac's size, body control, and ability to find soft spots in zone coverages.  Horn gives them the ability to stretch the field and he plays special teams.   Moore has a nice smile and can dance.  He filled in well last season, but to get better as a team, you have to upgrade your players.  I think Moore is a bottom of the roster guy who got bumped when we drafted 2 WRs and signed a legit free agent.  Here is the thing--TMac makes us better because he is great against the zone--man?  Good luck with that.  AT's role can be reduced, and that is probably a good thing.  He can specialize in situational football. Coker?  Just getting started. XL?  Just getting started.  Drafting TMac was probably a bit of a wake up call, but XL will be better as the 2. Renfrow?  I see him splitting reps with AT--keeping both fresh and giving different looks. Horn?  Watch the safety cheat his side when he is in the game--I see a young Steve Smith type in him, but he has yet to play a game.  I hear that Morgan loves him.
×
×
  • Create New...