Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What FA WR do you want (and we can afford)


shaqattaq

Recommended Posts

Ok, at this point I think we all understand that picking up the option on Torrey Smith is basically an insurance policy until we find someone better (unless MH is a moron, which is certainly debatable). We can cut him whenever and keep the $5M. My question is this...What FA would you sign? There are obviously some that would awesome, but out of our price range, and some that would be dead weight. According to OTC, we still have $12.2 M in cap space, counting Smith. Here's a link to the FA tracker:

https://www.rotoworld.com/article/free-agency-update/2019-nfl-free-agent-tracker

I'd like to target Jordan Matthews from Philly. He's young (26), big (6'3", 215), and should be available at a low price (played last year on a 1 year $739K contract). From 2014 - 2016, he was pretty dang good, 872, 997, and 804 yards and 19 TD's. Granted, he hasn't done poo for the last 2 years, but if he can get back close to those first 3 years he could be a good fit here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I really wanted Matthews when he was coming out of Vandy, but honestly he's basically a Funchess clone. If you wanted Funchess gone, you don't want Matthews. Honestly, if we're carrying Smith this year I'd rather just look for a WR in the mid-late rounds.

I still think that Smith is just on the roster until we find a replacement. I'd be fine with a Funchess clone provided 2 things. We sign at $1M - $1.5M instead of $10 M, and he's behind DJ, Samuel, and Wright in the pecking order. He's a big, cheap guy with potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shaqattaq said:

I still think that Smith is just on the roster until we find a replacement. I'd be fine with a Funchess clone provided 2 things. We sign at $1M - $1.5M instead of $10 M, and he's behind DJ, Samuel, and Wright in the pecking order. He's a big, cheap guy with potential. 

I'm done with WRs with inconsistent effort and even more inconsistent hands. I'd honestly rather have Bersin on the roster. At least the guy actually catches balls thrown his direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm done with WRs with inconsistent effort and even more inconsistent hands. I'd honestly rather have Bersin on the roster. At least the guy actually catches balls thrown his direction.

You know, that's actually not a terrible shout.  Bersin is 6'3", he's not going to take time away from our ascending stars, from all reports was a great locker room guy, and as you said, he does catch the ball.  In a WR room with Funchess and KB, Bersin was just more of the same.  In a room with Samuel, Moore and Wright, he does offer something a little different.

Honestly, if it's a question of Damiere Byrd or Brenton Bersin . . . I almost think the answer might be Bersin.  That's scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I still think that Smith is just on the roster until we find a replacement. I'd be fine with a Funchess clone provided 2 things. We sign at $1M - $1.5M instead of $10 M, and he's behind DJ, Samuel, and Wright in the pecking order. He's a big, cheap guy with potential. 

HaHa would be nice.

Ryan Grant as the funchess replacement or JJ Nelson as the speedster to replace smith. Both should be cheap and could bring something to the wr group.

Grant showed some flashes w washington and early w Indy. He is only 6ft so 4 inches shorter than funchess on paper and 3 inches taller than funchess on he field.

If they are big enough for a 4-3, Steve McClendon or Brandon Mebane to plug a hole as a backup DT for a year. If not, then then Sylvester Williams.

thats it. Then draft the poo out of DE, OT , OG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...