Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Kalil still not healthy. Says “Everyone knows what type of player I can be”


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

Side question: How bad was that knee injury? Odd to me that he had no issues (yet another beat I’ve felt in a long time offseason quote), then had a “minor procedure” and was estimated to be back in a couple weeks, then spent the entire season on IR, and is still not healthy? Seems very Otah ish to me 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt 'Speedbump' Kalil,

I couldn't agree more.  I am almost assured that you mean we all know that you could be the absolute worst starting left tackle in the NFL. I have never seen one player so detrimental to the state of the franchise and the health of one player than you. At "full health" as you usually claim to be year in and year out, I wouldn't want you protecting my son's quarterback. He's 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Side question: How bad was that knee injury? Odd to me that he had no issues (yet another beat I’ve felt in a long time offseason quote), then had a “minor procedure” and was estimated to be back in a couple weeks, then spent the entire season on IR, and is still not healthy? Seems very Otah ish to me 

We didn't want him to return and get legitimately hurt to where we couldn't release him. 

The Texans have thrown away $7.5M in cap space this year if they carry him to the regular season. How in the HELL did Kalil convince a team to give him $7.5M after completely fleecing us? Dude has the GOAT agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some guys just never come back from those injuries....not all ACL tears are the same.

Hate it, and really wish that he could have worked out here long term, but it wasn't in the cards.

The one I hate worse though?  Oher.  While not great, he was good enough, tough the way he went out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...