Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks looking to trade Frank Clark


Cheek

Recommended Posts

He is probably better than anything we will get at 16 HOWEVER he will be light years more expensive than anyone we will get at 16. I think if we were in a different position as far as salary cap and overall team needs, I would be down for swapping that 16 for Frank Clark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He is probably better than anything we will get at 16 HOWEVER he will be light years more expensive than anyone we will get at 16. I think if we were in a different position as far as salary cap and overall team needs, I would be down for swapping that 16 for Frank Clark.

Agree, not sure how we could pay him what he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Agree, not sure how we could pay him what he wants.

We have the ability to clear out a LOT of cap space going into next season.

Paying him honestly wouldn't be an issue. Committing to him long-term might be. It took a few years for Hardy's full crazy to emerge too. Imagine if we had signed him long-term instead of tagging him. Ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's gonna want a Khalil Mack type contract. He also had significant off-field concerns coming out of college. When a team wants to trade a talent like him who's only 25, ya gotta wonder why. 

Bingo... what keeps a guy like Clark in line when he's not having to earn his big contract

The only caveat to that is that maybe with the astronomical contract they gave Wilson they know they cant keep him... still should give a good GM pause

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who want our first pick to make a big impact in defense he would do.more than any rookie we could get at 16 and we could surely afford him. If you need an edge rusher then he is your guy. Sure he isn't cheap but any rookie we get will need 2 or 3 years to come into his own. Clark is plug and play 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would the staff even want him with his domestic violence history after going through it with Hardy? It seems like most of the league has forgot about it, but I know as soon as the Panthers get him they'd dig up whatever they can. I'd rather we just not bother with him, but maybe it's just me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's gonna want a Khalil Mack type contract. He also had significant off-field concerns coming out of college. When a team wants to trade a talent like him who's only 25, ya gotta wonder why. 

Agreed. Clark has some definite red flags and while we have cap room we don't exactly have loads of it (gotta keep some in reserve for the season).

I would say if the Panthers did have any interest in Clark, they should probably ask his former teammate Bruce Irvin for his opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's gonna want a Khalil Mack type contract. He also had significant off-field concerns coming out of college. When a team wants to trade a talent like him who's only 25, ya gotta wonder why. 

I figured it had more to do with them just giving Russel Wilson a 20m/year raise, having less than 10m in cap space going into the draft.  And Wilson's contract being more back ended.

Clark looks to want to be paid now, rather than go a year on franchise.  And I don't blame him.  He has yet to sign his franchise tag tender.  So combined with the low cap space and this...its why I expect the Seahawks are looking for a 1st rounder.

I am not saying his off-field concerns coming out of college aren't valid.  But I don't see it as why suddenly *now* the Seahawks would have an issue with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

I figured it had more to do with them just giving Russel Wilson a 20m/year raise, having less than 10m in cap space going into the draft.  And Wilson's contract being more back ended.

Clark looks to want to be paid now, rather than go a year on franchise.  And I don't blame him.  He has yet to sign his franchise tag tender.  So combined with the low cap space and this...its why I expect the Seahawks are looking for a 1st rounder.

I am not saying his off-field concerns coming out of college aren't valid.  But I don't see it as why suddenly *now* the Seahawks would have an issue with it.

Yeah and they may also just simply not view him as worth what he is asking. I am not as concerned about his off field issues as I am the financial aspects of getting him. We have a lot of cap space opening up in the next 2-3 years but we will also have Cam and Luke to extend and some of our "core" players coming off rookie deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...