Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The offensive line is the biggest issue. It’s just not fun to point blame at ugly fat guys.


Montsta

Recommended Posts

These guys are junk. Cam had plenty of good throws. He got his ass kicked once again. And the coaches calling the gadget play instead of trying to let your 6’6” 250lbs QB push through the pile for half a yard? They see it too. Worst o-line Cam has had maybe ever but definitely bottom 2. Every one of them is complete junk. It’s not a glamorous position for talking heads to rag on but they should all be taken behind the wood shed and beaten.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're absolutely right though. that drive where Cam hit a bomb to Olsen and then got sacked and hit as he threw for the next 3 plays in a row was an encapsulation of the whole game. and then Barret coming through unblocked later in the 4th was just mind boggling, how were they not doubling him by that point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Little better start next game. I could at least put up with some learning curves with him.  Darryl is pure trash. 

I said it before.  I wanted Moton at LT and draft Cody Ford for RT.  Instead we get Darryl who did a worse impression of Speedbump McGee. 

Wtf.  

Little is still in the concussion protocol isn't he? 

Moton needs to be moved to LT and let Williams go back to RT ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Little better start next game. I could at least put up with some learning curves with him.  Darryl is pure trash. 

I said it before.  I wanted Moton at LT and draft Cody Ford for RT.  Instead we get Darryl who did a worse impression of Speedbump McGee. 

Wtf.  

Granted it was a small sample, but based on what I saw of Greg Little in the preseason, I don't really think he's an improvement. More like just a different kind of bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...