Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers 6th in points scored, 14th in points allowed


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I’d be more worried about this game if Jimmy G actually looked good. He hasn’t. And their run game isn’t all that scary with injuries on the OL and their FB our. I think it’ll be a defensive struggle on both sides and whoever wins the turnover battle wins (and our D has been amazing at taking the ball away and getting sacks, while our offense has barely turned it over). I like our odds in this type of game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I like Allen, but we have forced a significant amount of turnovers, giving us a short field.  That helps a lot.

he's a udfa.  its incredible.  he's amazing.    have we ever seen this before with someone who didn't do nfl europe?   i got no idea what the kids ceiling is, neither do you, but this is absolutely amazing.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

I remember Burns score, who else scored a td?

vs. Rams - Blocked punt to opp 5 (TD)

vs. Bucs - Safety, Big Punt Return to opp 39 (FG)

vs. Cardinals - INT to opp 22 (TD), INT to opp 22 (FG)

vs. Texans - Partially blocked punt to near mid field (FG), INT to near mid field (TD), Fumble to opp 33 (FG).

vs. Jags - Fumble to opp 24 (TD), Fumble returned for TD

vs Bucs - INT to opp 29 (FG), INT to opp 36 (TD), INT to opp 8 (TD), Muffed punt to opp 17 (FG)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...