Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

60+ sacks


ncfan

Recommended Posts

NO team, not the 2015 Broncos, None

 

Has had at least 60 sacks in a season since.................................

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The 2013 Panthers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The 2019 Panthers?

We are currently on pace to have 72 sacks.....72

after being 27th in sacks last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its why I'm a little bit leery of our success. We're doing a lot of things that probably aren't sustainable. Our sack rate. Our rate of forcing turnovers. No INTs over the last 4 games. CMC leading the league by a wide margin in yards from scrimmage. 6th round rookies stepping in and playing like All-Pro LT.

Don't get me wrong, I love being 4-2 especially after an 0-2 start, but I hope we can maintain our success when the law of averages kicks in and some of these breaks start hedging the other direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Its why I'm a little bit leery of our success. We're doing a lot of things that probably aren't sustainable. Our sack rate. Our rate of forcing turnovers. No INTs over the last 4 games. CMC leading the league by a wide margin in yards from scrimmage. 6th round rookies stepping in and playing like All-Pro LT.

Don't get me wrong, I love being 4-2 especially after an 0-2 start, but I hope we can maintain our success when the law of averages kicks in and some of these breaks start hedging the other direction.

Probably when our opposing QBs become Wilson, Rodgers, Brees etc it will cool our pace down some 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Its why I'm a little bit leery of our success. We're doing a lot of things that probably aren't sustainable. Our sack rate. Our rate of forcing turnovers. No INTs over the last 4 games. CMC leading the league by a wide margin in yards from scrimmage. 6th round rookies stepping in and playing like All-Pro LT.

Don't get me wrong, I love being 4-2 especially after an 0-2 start, but I hope we can maintain our success when the law of averages kicks in and some of these breaks start hedging the other direction.

We’re fuging due a few months of breaks staying our way heh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...