Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam’s take will be interesting


CRA

Recommended Posts

Ron is defiantly a players coach and by all appearances as big of a Cam guy as we know....

Will be interesting to see Cam’s take.  Probably will take awhile for it to come but that could go many ways.  Take the it’s a business approach? Take the find a new home approach 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Ron is defiantly a players coach and by all appearances as big of a Cam guy as we know....

Will be interesting to see Cam’s take.  Probably will take awhile for it to come but that could go many ways.  Take the it’s a business approach? Take the find a new home approach 

Rivera was a Cam guy?

The guy who benched him for not wearing a tie

The guy who said, "he would have taken a shot", when Cam was getting multiple concussions a game

Yeah no

Rivera ruined Cam with his disregard for his health

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all, Rivera and his tap dancing of who would start week in and out was enough to say he’s not particularly a cam guy, could have said what most expected from the beginning that once cam is healthy he is our starter but instead he kept the “we’ll see” approach week in and out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...