Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You know who Luke reminds me of these days?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Honestly, I think the 3-4 defense experiment was just wrong in the end.

The best player on our defense, possibly our team, was the prototype for a 4-3 MLB. Our defensive tackles were sized for a 4-3 but could not play a NT in a 3-4 and were just not up to par as tackles in a 3-4. Shaq has shown out, but honestly, I think he was also better in the 4-3.

You can certainly make a case that we have spent most of the season in the 4-3 alignment, but there's something about the build that doesn't seem to fit our personnel. Luke just hasn't been himself in this and it shows. 

We have done better in the secondary, somewhat, but I think that has a lot to do with experience and bringing along Cockerell and Boston -- both who have played way beyond what I was expecting.

Let's get Luke back into place and get this all straightened out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

 

You can certainly make a case that we have spent most of the season in the 4-3 alignment, but there's something about the build that doesn't seem to fit our personnel. Luke just hasn't been himself in this and it shows. 

 

I think the problem with Luke this season hasn't been Luke, but the line in front of him.  He's nearly always being asked to fight off a lineman to get to his gap, where in the past, he was very free to roam and be . . . Luke.  I realize we've had some injuries on our line, but still, our D line hasn't done ANYTHING this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not convienced it's the 3-4 but the hybrid 3-4 that was built thats the problem. We play out of a weak 4-3 cluster too much and neither work. The transition looks to have been very poorly done and if this was the vision duing conception, its a huge failure before they ever hit the field. Also, the situational player subs seems to also be terrible. Top down, this defense is just a mess regardless of its parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or the Luke before he had Star and KK in front of him.

 

The Luke that had the Fua etc in front of him?

 

Scheme aint the problem.  Lose talent and injuries are the problem.

When you have interior DL being successfully blocked 1 on 1 by Jimmy Graham.  You're setting up your MLBs for failure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poe is a true 3-4 NT

McCoy / Short - are fits at 3-4 DE

We are a little undersized at the OLB positions. 

Factor in we lost Short early, and now our NT anchor in Poe it we were going to see poor run defense, we have yet to see this defense fully complimented, and this is the first year of the switch there were bound to  be some growing pains as the depth isn't there yet. 

The pressure we have been able to generate / the blitz looks were a thing of beauty early on while guys were healthy, Burns looks like Addison's replacement (unless he re-signs a friendly deal)

A swap back to 4-3 makes 0 sense, all of our LBs on the edge are better 3-4 fits, and Luke / Shaq when the DL takes up blocks have looked good, the consistency up front just isn't there. 

Add in the fact that the F-150's chosen one is not good and we can't score on offense, teams wear us down and the run defense gets even worse as the game goes on because we can't score points to make OTHER teams one dimensional like us, and being in more obvious passing situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Poe is a true 3-4 NT

McCoy / Short - are fits at 3-4 DE

We are a little undersized at the OLB positions. 

Factor in we lost Short early, and now our NT anchor in Poe it we were going to see poor run defense, we have yet to see this defense fully complimented, and this is the first year of the switch there were bound to  be some growing pains as the depth isn't there yet. 

The pressure we have been able to generate / the blitz looks were a thing of beauty early on while guys were healthy, Burns looks like Addison's replacement (unless he re-signs a friendly deal)

A swap back to 4-3 makes 0 sense, all of our LBs on the edge are better 3-4 fits, and Luke / Shaq when the DL takes up blocks have looked good, the consistency up front just isn't there. 

Add in the fact that the F-150's chosen one is not good and we can't score on offense, teams wear us down and the run defense gets even worse as the game goes on because we can't score points to make OTHER teams one dimensional like us, and being in more obvious passing situations. 

the problem is poe has been inconsistent at best for us even when healthy- i'm ready to move on 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...