Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions on Scott Turner's playcalling today?


PleaseCutStewart

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, CLG said:

I like that he will keep doing what's working. If they dont stop it, he will run the play over and over or multiple times in a drive.  

Teams do that to us but rarely the other way around. 

To be fair, Norv did the same thing just earlier this year. When we played Jacksonville we ran mid zone like 15 times. Which Greg Olsen said is practically unheard of in the NFL. They couldn’t stop it and CMac had like 150 rushing yards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Smithers said:

He did well.  Kyle killed three drives and we still scored 24 points. 

Killed three drives, but got us to a score on four.

He's perplexing. He has these terrible unwise moments (and there are tipped balls that cause issue, too) but the guy can also march the team 86 yards down the field for a touchdown in less than two minutes. (And he's done that last minute march multiple times this year.)

I'd really like to see him play with good protection, but that's not going to happen again this season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was pleasantly surprised for the most part. I liked the level of involvement all around with him being on the sideline coaching players up directly compared to having a guy huddled up in the booth by himself all game. If not for the turnovers we should have been in position to win with a very solid gameplan from Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly it hasn't been bad these past two games but it is a very small sample size. Turnovers are what killed us and I don't think those turnovers were Turner's fault due to bad plays being called, just poor execution by the QB. 

The Defense on the other hand... 

Oof. 

Also, Donte Jackson does not look like an NFL Corner...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...