Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jourdan Rodrigue says Hurney is "seriously respected in many football circles"


bobowilson

Recommended Posts

From the Athletic, she was asked

https://theathletic.com/1570257/2020/01/30/panthers-offseason-mailbag-the-new-coaching-staff-a-rebuild-cam-newton-free-agency-the-draft-and-toast/?source=dailyemail

Why do the Panthers, specifically Tepper, insist on keeping Hurney? — Jeff V.

Quote

Hurney is seriously respected in many football circles, where it is believed Tepper sought some advice/consulting as he began to turn his attention from the business side of the team to the football side in his second year of ownership.

Quote

For some reason, I got a few folks Mad Online for answering this one on Twitter a while back. My answer hasn’t changed: To me, the fact that Hurney has been retained while the entire football staff got replaced means that he presented a strategy of operations to Tepper, and Tepper thought it was solid and believed Hurney could execute it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bobowilson said:

From the Athletic, she was asked

https://theathletic.com/1570257/2020/01/30/panthers-offseason-mailbag-the-new-coaching-staff-a-rebuild-cam-newton-free-agency-the-draft-and-toast/?source=dailyemail

Why do the Panthers, specifically Tepper, insist on keeping Hurney? — Jeff V.

 

what does she say about cam in that article?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

what does she say about cam in that article?

Quote

 

The fact that Rhule maintained he had not spoken with ownership/front office staff much about an upcoming plan for Newton (if true) tells me that Newton was not a “draw” to taking the job, but also that his uncertain future was not a deterrent.

Let’s say for the sake of argument that this perspective from Gross is indeed how the new staff is leaning: To me, that still doesn’t necessarily mean Newton would be gone in 2020. He could be a “bridge” quarterback, as a younger prospect develops. Yet … would Newton want that for himself? Could he opt to hold out without a guarantee past this season? Or could the staff want to give said hypothetical young quarterback a little more breathing room, to learn about a leadership role without Newton?

We’re still in essentially the same spot as we have been for quite a while, in that we simply don’t know what will happen with Newton until March.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you can bilk draft picks from a team because the GM doesn't understand team building, hell yes you are going to say everything in your power to keep that man a GM.

I can see Ozzie Newsome and Bill B over the past 15 years giving Hurney glowing reviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do these cirlce spend their time losing also or are they the ones beating us in games and trades?

Hurney is garbage and i have no issues being loud about it. I call BS, his work speaks for itself and he is a giant turd in the punch bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Jerry Richardson seriously respected in football circles?

I think Hurney's lack of employment by other NFL teams when he was first fired tells you all you need to know.

I imagine Tepper is keeping him around to make the transition to a new front office somewhat smoother but I pray to Sir Purr Hurney isn't given too much input in determining the long term vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cary Kollins said:

Was Jerry Richardson seriously respected in football circles?

I think Hurney's lack of employment by other NFL teams when he was first fired tells you all you need to know.

I imagine Tepper is keeping him around to make the transition to a new front office somewhat smoother but I pray to Sir Purr Hurney isn't given too much input in determining the long term vision.

RR might be right on the reason Hurney is being kept around. The more I think about the more it makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

When you can bilk draft picks from a team because the GM doesn't understand team building, hell yes you are going to say everything in your power to keep that man a GM.

I can see Ozzie Newsome and Bill B over the past 15 years giving Hurney glowing reviews.

For the record, the article does also say she doesn't guarantee he stays GM after the draft.

Rodrigue was a pretty big Rivera supporter too. She's a good reporter overall, but apparently not so good when it comes to staying objective with people she covers.

It's also fairly well known that Marty feeds information to local sources. It's a good way to make people reluctant to say something bad about you.

Marty's background was never in personnel, it was in PR. It should be no surprise that what he does best is market himself. Unfortunately, Tepper doesn't seem smart enough to be able to see through the spin job and recognize what a sh-tty job he's doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

When you can bilk draft picks from a team because the GM doesn't understand team building, hell yes you are going to say everything in your power to keep that man a GM.

I can see Ozzie Newsome and Bill B over the past 15 years giving Hurney glowing reviews.

Pretty sure he consulted with football guys not currently in the league, why would they lie about him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

Was Jerry Richardson seriously respected in football circles?

I think Hurney's lack of employment by other NFL teams when he was first fired tells you all you need to know.

I imagine Tepper is keeping him around to make the transition to a new front office somewhat smoother but I pray to Sir Purr Hurney isn't given too much input in determining the long term vision.

Jeff Fisher got multiple jobs.

Yet Marty, a GM with 11 years experience at the time, wasn't even asked to be a low level scout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...