Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I wouldn't jump the gun yet.  Testing is being done more and more.  As a result there are more cases being discovered.  That doesn't necessarily mean the virus is is spreading uncontrollably again.  Only 7% of occupied hospital beds are currently being used for COVID-19 patients and still a 1/3 of hospital beds are completely vacant. 

this is now how shutting down works

you do it before it gets bad, not after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Riddle me this: barely 5% of the population of SC has been tested and only 7% of hospital beds in SC are currently in use for COVID-19 patients, so if the number of positive cases keeps increasing shouldn't the number of hospital patients increase accordingly?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

Simple ways to fix that.  Either you get the vaccine or you don't work for me or anyone else that gets or got a government subsidy of some sort.

So if X% of the population decides to not get the vaccine, they should be fired? That’s some authoritarian poo there.

I get it for schools and healthcare workers, but jeez.

image.jpeg.5e12531ea79bf3ca48aad65bd87177e5.jpeg

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Riddle me this: barely 5% of the population of SC has been tested and only 7% of hospital beds in SC are currently in use for COVID-19 patients, so if the number of positive cases keeps increasing shouldn't the number of hospital patients increase accordingly?  

Positive tests generally lag 1-2 weeks behind actual infection and hospitalization often lags an additional 1-2 weeks after positive tests. You don't know you're actually in a spike until the SHTF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Positive tests generally lag 1-2 weeks behind actual infection and hospitalization often lags an additional 1-2 weeks after positive tests. You don't know you're actually in a spike until the SHTF.

The one week to 10 days people are usually the asymptomatic and mild cases.   Correct, hospitalization is usually those over that time period.  To my point though, every time there is a spike we shutter everything again?  Put the information out there and some folks will take it upon themselves to observe best practices to hopefully prevent contracting it.   

We can't bounce around between shuttering and reopening mode indefinitely like flipping a light switch.   If it does get bad, things will shut back down briefly, but shuttering simply by projecting is just as dangerous.  People are finally getting back to work and then we yank the rug right back from underneath them based on a projection?

Again, we discussed this a week or so ago that as testing increase, positive cases were almost inevitably going to increase.  We know for a fact that early on not enough test were available and people, if not in immediate need to be hospitalized were turned away.  Now, those people that would have been turned away two months ago are getting tested and with the remote testing locations popping up everywhere, even those with mild symptoms are getting themselves tested.  That being said, is it a spike in the sense SHTF or simply more samples are being taken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

The one week to 10 days people are usually the asymptomatic and mild cases.   Correct, hospitalization is usually those over that time period.  To my point though, every time there is a spike we shutter everything again?  Put the information out there and some folks will take it upon themselves to observe best practices to hopefully prevent contracting it.   

We can't bounce around between shuttering and reopening mode indefinitely like flipping a light switch.   If it does get bad, things will shut back down briefly, but shuttering simply by projecting is just as dangerous.  People are finally getting back to work and then we yank the rug right back from underneath them based on a projection?

Again, we discussed this a week or so ago that as testing increase, positive cases were almost inevitably going to increase.  We know for a fact that early on not enough test were available and people, if not in immediate need to be hospitalized were turned away.  Now, those people that would have been turned away two months ago are getting tested and with the remote testing locations popping up everywhere, even those with mild symptoms are getting themselves tested.  That being said, is it a spike in the sense SHTF or simply more samples are being taken?

We had 2 of our guys who potentially came into contact with an infected person.  The way it played out was completely different based on how things have changed.

Late March - Our guy couldn't get tested, and the sick guy that they came into contact with had to jump thru hoops to get tested, and we aren't even sure if they eventually gave him a test or not,

Beginning of June - Our guy was tested immediately, as well as every other person that was identified as a possible contact with the infected person.  The infected person wasn't even "sick," they came up as positive after taking the test without symptoms...because we can do that now.

Edited by Wes21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The World Health Organization walked back comments made Monday when one of its top scientists said transmission of the coronavirus by people who never developed symptoms is “very rare,” which drew skepticism from physicians and others across social media.

That admission sent shock waves throughout the world, much of which has been locked down for months for fear of spreading the virus by people who show no signs of illness.

Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said Tuesday that asymptomatic spread is a “really complex question” and much is still unknown. “We don’t actually have that answer yet,” she said.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I felt pretty good about us making progress this season, surprising some people, and getting some more wins than last season going into it.  Now, after preseason, my expectations are much, much lower. I was talking with my friend who is a Bears fan, and we were discussing their drubbing of the Bills and how people try to dismiss it as “preseason, so it doesn’t count.”  It absolutely counts.  Not the wins or losses.  No one really cares about that.  But what the Bears are doing shows that even in a vanilla, non-specific scheme, they are executing at an elite level and they are disciplined.  It shows they are well coached.  They see growth in their players.  Versus us - hard to tell what we’re looking at because everything is a fuging mess.  In games we’re still undisciplined, be it penalties or assignments.  We do NOT execute.  We got random coaches calling plays that won’t be calling plays during the season, we have our players getting into fights in the last padded practice of the preseason, then we have Bryce and Chuba trying to correct it while our coach sat off to the side laughing.  To be clear, I like Canales.  He seems like a good dude.  But, it feels like we have very little direction and discipline.  You’re allowing a team who has been historically bad the last almost decade, with a losing culture that mostly bereft of talent to self-police?  You’re allowing subordinates to work in pet projects at the expense of getting valuable reps and evaluation of players in during games?     My friend literally brought up last night that when Ben Johnson got there he essentially put DJ Moore in notice because it was starting to be perceived that he was displaying some diva-behavior.  That’s leadership.  And they’re reaping the benefits early and setting a tone.  My friend said there is an excitement and confidence in and around their team that’s he’s never felt his entire life.  And here we are, sounding and looking like The Bad News Bears in our final week of training camp and preseason.  I literally stopped watching after halftime last week.  I used to watch every play faithfully, even in 2001 and 2010.  It was fun.  This isn’t.  We are bad and our administration keeps making bad decisions to compound things.  Reading poo like this today is just fuging deflating.
    • With so much of the focus the past couple years being on offense, the defense has definitely taken a backseat to the talent available in the draft. I get it, they want to surround their number one draft pick QB with offensive playmakers but unfortunately that has come with a price that so far has not worked Let’s hope the offense and Bryce Young put it together this year or it’s going to be another rebuild next year with another new QB. 
    • I was intrigued by him but always said it comes down to the interview process and talking to his former coaches, etc. You gotta find out if he's coachable and has the mental makeup. I think we've found the answer. LOL
×
×
  • Create New...