Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I don't know if we're actually trading Samuel but...

PantherPhann89

By PantherPhann89,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PantherPhann89 Mentor

PantherPhann89

Posted
Posted

But I do know that it most likely won't be to the Eagles because they just traded for Marquise Goodwin from the 49'ers. Currently, the Eagles will have DeSean Jackson, Alshon Jeffery , Goodwin and youngsters Reagor, Arcega-Whiteside and Deontay Burnett. I don't see room for Samuels on their roster. Unless things change, we'll trot out Robbie Anderson, Pharoh Cooper,  Keith Kirkwood,  DJ Moore, Curtis Samuel and about 5 others including Seth Roberts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnHurnBurn Newbie

BurnHurnBurn

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann89 Mentor

PantherPhann89

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Yes it actually would. They have Adams and Fun Fun....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gesualdo Newbie

Gesualdo

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

As much as I hate Tom Brady, there's no way in hell he could ever match Aaron's pout power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trucpfan Mentor

trucpfan

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Why would the heck would we trade a key piece to our new offense. I’m not seeing it we didn’t in the draft we’re NOT depleting our offense this is Joe Brady’s first season I’m pretty sure he’s trying to start out with a bang. Think about a young Kyle Shannon or Sean M young offensive guru. He’s not getting rid of a dynamic playmaker who’s only knock is getting catchable passes. We didn’t even look at the offense in the draft because Brady probably said I can score 28 if you can get a few stops we’ll win. We have a electric playmaker in Samuels, best RB in the league. A true savage dog leader in yac in WR in DJ and a leader in yards per pass in RA. Who gets rid of key pieces with no replacement to start his nfl career. It doesn’t make sense we’ve beefed up our O in free agency. And then addressed our d in the draft. Now with good coaching we can win 10 games based off our opponents maybe less hopefully more but our offense was strong last year I’d expect a much stronger showing with TB. Our d was ass we should be average atleast on defense which plays out to be a pretty good team

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

Being a douchebag is what cost Rodgers being the #1 overall pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted

We didn’t draft a WR, Samuel isn’t going anywhere. The drop off behind him is huge. If you want 3 WRs on the field, Samuel is it. None of the other WRs is close in talent. Seth Roberts is 29 and hasn’t ever eclipsed 500 yards or 5 TDs. Cooper is a returner and has 243 yards and 1 TD as his best. Kirk wood has 13 career receptions. Every other WR is an UDFA. It’s laughable that people still think in Brady’s offense that we’d trade our only real WR3. Samuel is so much more talented than everyone except Moore and probably on the same level as Anderson. He’s not going anywhere if the staff thinks we can compete. Also, the rest of the WRs is why I think Bayless has a great shot of making the team if he’s decent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann89 Mentor

PantherPhann89

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, trucpfan said:

Why would the heck would we trade a key piece to our new offense. I’m not seeing it we didn’t in the draft we’re NOT depleting our offense this is Joe Brady’s first season I’m pretty sure he’s trying to start out with a bang. Think about a young Kyle Shannon or Sean M young offensive guru. He’s not getting rid of a dynamic playmaker who’s only knock is getting catchable passes. We didn’t even look at the offense in the draft because Brady probably said I can score 28 if you can get a few stops we’ll win. We have a electric playmaker in Samuels, best RB in the league. A true savage dog leader in yac in WR in DJ and a leader in yards per pass in RA. Who gets rid of key pieces with no replacement to start his nfl career. It doesn’t make sense we’ve beefed up our O in free agency. And then addressed our d in the draft. Now with good coaching we can win 10 games based off our opponents maybe less hopefully more but our offense was strong last year I’d expect a much stronger showing with TB. Our d was ass we should be average atleast on defense which plays out to be a pretty good team

I agree wholeheartedly, but Samuel was rumored to be in trade talks entering the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Mentor

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted

Now that the draft is over, the front office talk needs to be on re-signing him in advance of 2021 offseason, not trading him. He's only 23 and was sorely underutilized under the RR regime. Brady will use him properly and I can see a lot of motion with confusing defenses w/ Samuel and CMC out of the backfield. 

Samuel is about to blow up and we need to not be in another Bradberry situation this coming offseason. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      https://wfnz.com/schedule/the-clubhouse-with-kyle-bailey/ Starts around 1100 I am not sure how connected Al Wallace is but he thinks bryce is going to get paid (50+) and it may happen within the first 4 games of this season.   He thinks the offense looked good last season.  Not really sure what the hell he was watching.
    • Growl
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Growl · Posted

      Waiting to see how the OT situation plays out is probably going to be a big part of the calculus.
    • MHS831
      Post-Draft: Gantt sets A stage, not THE stage. Perhaps Reset Your Expectations

      By MHS831 · Posted

      If you draft players who can push the starters in competitions, then you have depth.  Gantt's focus is Week 1, 2026.  That is never my view.  if your focus is on talent alone, and if you do not consider the salary cap, then this is accurate.  If a player making $25m per season can be traded or not renewed because you have a player on a rookie contract who can do the job almost as well--before the maturation and experience occurs, then you may take a small step back for a moment so that you can leap forward later.  About Walker--LTs have done pretty well in Green Bay's system.  He is a good pass protector, and so is Freeling. About DT--they are often rotational.  Hunter will still play and he will improve with experience.  The WR field is not that crowded.  If you have 5 different WRs who can play, they usually do.  Hecht might have the best opportunity to take a starting job, and he is a fifth rounder.   So you look at the cap and the idea is to start as many on rookie contracts as possible.  Does that mean to start rookies day 1.  Nope.  
×
×
  • Create New...