Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers alumni answer questions about Cam Newton


Icege

Recommended Posts

The Athletic article

Joe Person has a two part series that he is working on where he speaks with former Panthers players about Panthers-related topics.

Some interesting answers... excerpt below of two of the questions asked as well as all seven players' responses.

Quote

In a word or two, life without Cam Newton as the Panthers’ QB will be …?
Mike Tolbert (fullback, 2012-16):
Boring, like quarantine. Cam brought the excitement, man. To the locker room, to the community, to the team. Every team out there has a personality. And right now I don’t see anybody that can fill that void on this Panthers team, other than maybe Curtis Samuel. But he’s not as out there like that.

Roman Harper (safety, 2014-15): A place of anxiety. I think we’re anxious to see what’s gonna happen, what it’s gonna look like. You have this new name of Joe Brady and this offensive (system) everybody’s talked so great about it. So excited to see how that unfolds. And also, you don’t have the No. 1 overall quarterback with a big personality that overshines that. Now everything that does happen that’s great will go to Joe Brady. Teddy Bridgewater’s not gonna overshadow that part of it. And also, the organization as a whole, I think they’re anxious to see how they move on and how they trend without Cam Newton because you can’t say the Carolina Panthers without saying the (name), Cam Newton, in a sentence before this.

Jordan Gross (left tackle, 2003-13): Unusual.

Muhsin Muhammad (receiver, 1996-2004, 2008-09): Less controversial and less entertaining.

Colin Cole (defensive tackle, 2013-15): A growing pain. There’s gonna be some growing pains. It’s gonna be a situation where you learn. I think you change your philosophy as a team. I say life without Cam in the Panther locker room is gonna be different. You don’t have that big, boisterous personality, and a guy that was definitely a known leader.

Frank Garcia (guard/center, 1995-2000): Boring, bland, vanilla.

Wesley Walls (tight end, 1996-2002): Very different.

Did the Panthers err by waiting to release Newton fairly late in free agency?
Tolbert:
Yes. They’ve been doing him wrong timing-wise for the past two or three years, if you ask me. It goes back to his shoulder surgery. Everyone knew his shoulder was messed up in the middle of the year two years ago. But they wait until offseason gets ready to start to have shoulder surgery. Makes no sense. Timing’s off. As soon as he got hurt (last) preseason against the Patriots, they were saying, “Oh, he’s got a high ankle sprain.” I looked at it on film carefully. It’s not a high ankle sprain, you could tell that 10 minutes after the play. You knew it’s a mid-foot sprain, Lisfranc, something like that. But you wait ‘til December for him to beg you to have surgery. He shouldn’t have been out there Week 1 and 2. He shouldn’t have been out there probably ‘til Week 4 or 5, at minimum.

Harper: Yes, I totally think so, 3,000 percent. I don’t like the excuse of, “Well, we didn’t know.” If you have any questions and you have anything doing, I think you make the move. And I don’t think Cam would be on the street right now if everybody knew in the whole NFL that Cam Newton was gonna be available. That’s a huge deal, where now you actually get to shop around. When they released him, teams had already bid and picked their quarterbacks. The Colts had already went and found Philip Rivers. You also gotta have the right (chemistry) to be able to take on a personality and a player of Cam Newton’s existence.

Cole: I think it’s difficult no matter how you look at it. This is a business. They could have done things differently. Things could always be done differently. … I’ve been part of an organization that let a first-ballot Hall of Famer in Brett Favre walk away. And I’ve been around to see another first-ballot-to-be Hall of Famer Peyton Manning leave an organization he’d set multiple records with. And now we’ve all lived to be able to see something we never thought we’d see, which is Tom Brady in the NFC South. Anything is possible in this game, so nothing surprises me. But at the end of the day, nobody’s gonna like being cut, nobody’s gonna like cutting anybody. It’s just a part of the business.

Garcia: No. There’s a lot that comes with Cam as the package. He has a big personality and when you’re trying to establish leadership and identity and roles, you can’t have one guy bucking the system. I think that was a big factor, as well as potential reinjury with him. I think there’s a lot of uncertainty with him.

Walls: No. I thought it was handled as professionally as it could be. It’s a tough deal. Cam had a lot of success. And unfortunately, the injuries — which it does to every player out there — at some point your body fails you. And that sort of happened to Cam. But he’s probably got some more playing days ahead of him. I hope so, because he was fun to watch.

Gross: I think so. It would have been better for Cam to have more time in free agency before it began. And now especially — nobody knew we were all gonna be in lockdown. Anybody that’s coming off an injured season needs to have hands-on by teams for them to feel good about you. And Cam’s that by 10 times more because of his injury history. So teams are going to be cautious about doing any kind of signing because their ability to see him in person is limited. You can have a doctor’s note saying you’re limited. But every team in the world is gonna want to have their own guys check him out.

Muhammad: I don’t think COVID-19 did him any favors. I’ll just leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

But you wait 'til December for him to beg you to have surgery.

i thought newton was always against surgery, and any delays were a result of him exhausting every option before going under the knife?

and since when does an athlete, or anyone for that matter, have to beg for surgery? don't they have the final say so as to what happens when they get injured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nosuchthingasapanther said:

i thought newton was always against surgery, and any delays were a result of him exhausting every option before going under the knife?

and since when does an athlete, or anyone for that matter, have to beg for surgery? don't they have the final say so as to what happens when they get injured?

I thought so as well, but maybe not.  I would think ex players would know how it works better than us tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the small positive is that we got rid of a lot of the people who made the poor decisions around him the past 2-3 years.  Though, the new regime did flub the release. 

Harper makes a very interesting point.  We were a team with a QB that the offense should have been curated around (done poorly with Shula) and now we're heading to promising system with a QB that works within it.  Question is, how good can the offense Brady brings in turn it up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...