Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL network: Panthers at Patriots 2017 - Playing now


thennek

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

If only Funchess could time a jump or didn't "lose the ball in the lights", 2017 might've ended so much better. 

Right. I still say if Funchess catches that ball (which he should have), then I fully expected that 2017 team to get back to the Super Bowl. It was amazing what Cam was able to do in that game with the scrub receivers available to him. I can’t even remember the name of the guy who dropped an easy TD pass on the 1st qtr of that game. Nvm, Kaelin Clay. Clay didn’t really see anymore action from any other team beyond that season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AggieLean said:

Right. I still say if Funchess catches that ball (which he should have), then I fully expected that 2017 team to get back to the Super Bowl. It was amazing what Cam was able to do in that game with the scrub receivers available to him. I can’t even remember the name of the guy who dropped an easy TD pass on the 1st qtr of that game. Nvm, Kaelin Clay. Clay didn’t really see anymore action from any other team beyond that season.

Perfect example of the kind of game Cam never got enough credit for. Fall behind 21-6 on the road in NO, with no ground game beyond an over the hill JStew and never used CMC, with Funch, Clay, and Bersin the top 3 WRs against a good Saints D.  CMC had his huge catch and run and Olsen was his usual self, but Cam damn near willed the team to the win and arguably out-dueled Brees in his house in the playoffs.  Not to mention the shoulder was becoming a potential issue by this point.  A legit WR on the team that year and competent offensive coaching could've led to great things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/30/2020 at 9:03 PM, CarolinaNCSU said:

Perfect example of the kind of game Cam never got enough credit for. Fall behind 21-6 on the road in NO, with no ground game beyond an over the hill JStew and never used CMC, with Funch, Clay, and Bersin the top 3 WRs against a good Saints D.  CMC had his huge catch and run and Olsen was his usual self, but Cam damn near willed the team to the win and arguably out-dueled Brees in his house in the playoffs.  Not to mention the shoulder was becoming a potential issue by this point.  A legit WR on the team that year and competent offensive coaching could've led to great things. 

Cam showed that he didn't need a true #1 WR. The front office decided we needed to use resources for a top tier receiving threat, while Cam showed us time and time again that he needed a competent offensive line first and could make due with a bunch of JAG receivers. Give him a burner to keep the defense honest (even if he dropped the ball 50% of the time) and sure handed WRs/TEs. Iffy handed guys were quickly exposed by Cam and that cannon on his right shoulder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Comparing a random stat to another rookie QB has nothing to do with the current subject.  Tom Brady had a 6.0 YPA his rookie year.  I hope you're not using one stat to define success of a QB? It's not a problem to want him to do better based on where he was drafted although I still contend it doesn't matter after the fact.  It doesn't matter if we're talking about Cam Newton, Tom Brady, Russel Wilson or any other QB.  It makes little difference once you're in the NFL.  Nobody gets a ring for where they were drafted.   Higher draft picks will get a little more time in most cases as teams want to make sure they've exhausted all avenues before they admit a draft pick can't play.  Other teams might pick them up thinking it wasn't the player but the organization and/or other coaches that caused the player not to succeed.  It's people's expectations that are wrong.  If we could go back and redo all the draft and put guys in the correct draft spot based on how well they played in the NFL, that would be nice.  Then your argument would make some sense.  People assume that where a player was drafted is a statement on how good that player is when the reality is there is a lot more luck than skill in drafting. If Coker turns into a pro bowl receiver and XL becomes a bust nobody cares except fans and the media. What we really should say is it's not too much to expect a player who has started at QB for a team over the last 2 years to be better than he currently shows.   Don't compare 1st round picks.  Compare starting QB's in the NFL.
    • They’re gonna have to go up against a real offense before any kind of judgement can be made of them.  Tlaw looks like damaged goods, Kyler is completely washed, and Penix….well…. they look better compared to last season but that’s what you’d expect with a healthy brown and horn.  I haven’t seen anything that indicates they’ll be considered an overall good defense when the dust has settled. 2002 it is not. 
×
×
  • Create New...