Panthers in trade talks

[ImaginaryKev]

S Jones is intriguing simply due to being a former higher round pick and having some talent. Never put it together.

[t96]

54 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

He has proven he can play at the NFL level. That may be good enough for some teams really struggling at the position 

They could’ve just signed him this year though... if we trade him it’s probably for nothing higher than a later day 3 pick possibly conditional, or an equivalent player at a different position. I don’t think he alone would get us either of those Eagles corners, we’d have to add. That would be amazing though. I actually think Roberts is overpaid on this deal.

[t96]

28 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

S Jones is intriguing simply due to being a former higher round pick and having some talent. Never put it together.

I may be wrong but I think injuries just derailed his career. He hasn’t been a bust on the field, but just hasn’t been able to stay on the field and develop.

[Jared Patterson]

Any chance we trade for Rankins?

[Riverboat Ron]

Saints will sign Rankins to a 3 yr/ $55 million contract and still be under the cap in 2021.

[Panthercougar68]

1 hour ago, Riverboat Ron said:

Saints will sign Rankins to a 3 yr/ $55 million contract and still be under the cap in 2021.

Brees and Thomas gonna be on Saints payroll till 2038.

[ImaginaryKev]

4 hours ago, carhartt said:

Samuel and a 7th for Rasul Douglas and Sidney Jones. 

Oh no baby what is you doin

[Smithers]

Those Eagles corners were the worst in the NFL last year.  I’d put more faith in our rookies.

[kungfoodude]

20 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Those Eagles corners were the worst in the NFL last year.  I’d put more faith in our rookies.

Well.....we may end up having those kind of stats. I'd be shocked if we didn't end up as a bottom 5 unit in terms of coverage. 

[1of10Charnatives]

55 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well.....we may end up having those kind of stats. I'd be shocked if we didn't end up as a bottom 5 unit in terms of coverage. 

Agreed. If we're not bottom 5 coverage or close, I will chalk that as a win for the coaching staff.

[MHS831]

 

3 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Agreed. If we're not bottom 5 coverage or close, I will chalk that as a win for the coaching staff.

I am taking the approach that we will be watching next year's defense larva this season.   Developing players in Chinn, Robinson, Brown, YGM, Pride, Thomas-Oliver III, Roy, etc. new players like Apple, Burris, and whatever we do at LB--who knows?   It is going to be ugly. 

[1of10Charnatives]

Just now, MHS831 said:

 

I am taking the approach that we will be watching next year's defense larva this season.   Developing players in Chinn, Robinson, Brown, YGM, Pride, Thomas-Oliver III, Roy, etc. new players like Apple, Burris, and whatever we do at LB--who knows?   It is going to be ugly. 

Don't say larva when I'm eating scrambled eggs for breakfast. You should have waited til lunchtime to post this.

Focus.

[jfra78]

1 hour ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Agreed. If we're not bottom 5 coverage or close, I will chalk that as a win for the coaching staff.

I would rather be bottom 5 against the pass than bottom 5 against the run, which I feel like we will be in the top half this season.

[Moo Daeng]

I realize its a competition to mentionhow bad we will be in every fuging reply for some of you but I dint think they will be as awful as many do unless there are injuries. Its not completely devoid of talent if the defensive scheme and players can mesh in any sort of way.