Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moton appreciation thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

This happens all the time on the Huddle

This year: Extending him is a no brainer get it done Hurney

Next Year: This guy is overated and quit ever since getting paid, I can't believe Hurney paid him.

No problem with extending him because he has been consistent, which is something we have lacked. Even if he isn't all pro or pro bowl, at least you know what you are going to get and can build around that. Extending him when most of us realized this 2 years ago would have cost us a lot less than now. It just sucks that we waited to long, again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

No problem with extending him because he has been consistent, which is something we have lacked. Even if he isn't all pro or pro bowl, at least you know what you are going to get and can build around that. Extending him when most of us realized this 2 years ago would have cost us a lot less than now. It just sucks that we waited to long, again.

It was a no brainer, but this team and no brainers rarely work in harmony together.

Also, not only is he good, he is young, homegrown, and healthy...while playing at a very hard position to fill.

Nah, let's overpay an off ball linebacker instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

This happens all the time on the Huddle

This year: Extending him is a no brainer get it done Hurney

Next Year: This guy is overated and quit ever since getting paid, I can't believe Hurney paid him.

Take Hurney outta that equation and you wont hear a singular gripe from me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, thefuzz said:

It was a no brainer, but this team and no brainers rarely work in harmony together.

Also, not only is he good, he is young, homegrown, and healthy...while playing at a very hard position to fill.

Nah, let's overpay an off ball linebacker instead.

Your pimp hand is too strong now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thefuzz said:

It was a no brainer, but this team and no brainers rarely work in harmony together.

Also, not only is he good, he is young, homegrown, and healthy...while playing at a very hard position to fill.

Nah, let's overpay an off ball linebacker instead.

Case in point, should have kept Butker over Gano. Easy decision then, easy decision now. I'm not even kidding when I say this, I honestly think this forum could run the Panthers better than Hurney could. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Castavar said:

Case in point, should have kept Butker over Gano. Easy decision then, easy decision now. I'm not even kidding when I say this, I honestly think this forum could run the Panthers better than Hurney could. 

That too was a no brainer...but like I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...