Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting QB Rankings


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

This analysis creates some interesting groupings. Most would agree that Wilson/Rodgers are in a tier of their own this season by the eyeball test, and there's a small group of elite QBs behind them (Josh Allen's presence there is totally predictable, but did not expect Carr or Goff to be there).

Teddy appears to be leading up the group of good, solid, winning-caliber QBs in the mid-to-high tier. Also impressive how steep the dropoff is at the bottom - it's clear there's a "not an NFL QB" tier down there. Whether this metric does a good job of taking circumstance, play calling, and protection into account isn't clear to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to see who Teddy is behind, and who he is above.  Outside of Mahomes' criminally low marks (come on, wtf guys), the approximate groupings actually make sense and its hard for me to argue strongly one way or the other without knowing more about the other players on their teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Interesting to see who Teddy is behind, and who he is above.  Outside of Mahomes' criminally low marks (come on, wtf guys), the approximate groupings actually make sense and its hard for me to argue strongly one way or the other without knowing more about the other players on their teams.

Mahomes actually hasn't been that great this year, compared to his standards/expectations. It make sense that Wilson, Rodgers and Allen are all quite a bit above him. Those 3 have been absolutely on fire this year. It's not even a knock on Mahomes being quite a bit behind them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Daniel Jones sucks idk why Verge always thought he was good 

I hated the pick and completely hated it at 6th overall. I saw a few minutes of his 2020 play, Hes not bad at all. Just makes a terrible throw and it gets picked. The OL is below average and hes had to play hero ball too much. Lost black CMC and their TE cannt stay on the field. Gettleman has done no favors with his free agency signings either, needs them former superstars form the former GM but there were none. That giants roster was hella bad, I believe the first year he had 5 wavier claims at cut down. That lead the league and showed how poor the roster was. Issue is hes has not improved in 2 years and that division is super weak. Gettleman needs to be watching madlock and stealing batteries during the season now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jared Patterson said:

Daniel Jones sucks idk why Verge always thought he was good 

I'm not sure what he is really supposed to do given the game script and talent around him. He has plenty of potential, and we have seen it, but he had been stunted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...