Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Washington for the love of all that's holy please don't win gameday thread

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

GoPanthers123 Newbie

GoPanthers123

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CardiacCat said:

.....  "tankers".... did you ever play a competitive sport?  didn't you want to win every time you competed?  did anyone ever ask you to lose on purpose? do you have any clue what it means to the players on the field to win and showcase what they are capable of?  for several of them there may be millions (MILLIONS) on the line.... do you really think they are going to throw the game to PLEASE you?  if the answer to that last question is yes, you may have to be checked out by a medical professional !!!

Thank you for having common sense and believing in this team

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmartyHurney3 Newbie

SmartyHurney3

Posted
Posted
Just now, Double Trouble said:

We better get Trey Lance. If the Falcons get a franchise changing QB and we go defense...oof.

We have to trade up, which will be really expensive this year, at least next years 1st rounder+. Far too many teams need a QB this year, including most probably the Falcons, depending who they bring in at coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeSim Proficient

DeSim

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not so sure it's us being good.

Washington looks like refried zebra sh-t.

I’m not talking about just this game, based on the season as a whole and how competitive we’ve been in games we lost against good teams.  The main issue is Teddy, it sucks that we won’t pick third but imo...after Lawrence, I don’t think there’s much of a difference between the other 5 QBs that could go in the first round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Tbe said:

We’ll have to trade Cincy or the dolphins. For who though? Trask? Lance? Not smart to trade for long shots like that.

Exactly. Was hoping we’d get Fields but I’d be ok for Wilson or Sewell. 
 

No damn point now. poo we might actually end up with Parsons or Pitts after all. Talk about a bummer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmartyHurney3 Newbie

SmartyHurney3

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CardiacCat said:

.....  "tankers".... did you ever play a competitive sport?  didn't you want to win every time you competed?  did anyone ever ask you to lose on purpose? do you have any clue what it means to the players on the field to win and showcase what they are capable of?  for several of them there may be millions (MILLIONS) on the line.... do you really think they are going to throw the game to PLEASE you?  if the answer to that last question is yes, you may have to be checked out by a medical professional !!!

Yeah, we actually did you moron. It's how we know what talent and physical prowess means.

Did you play high school ball with anyone that made into a great college program or pro? I did, and they were fuging on another level compared to the rest of us.

You need talent to win, especially in the NFL. Ra-ra-retards are the worst type of fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mcsmoak Collaborator

mcsmoak

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CardiacCat said:

.....  "tankers".... did you ever play a competitive sport?  didn't you want to win every time you competed?  did anyone ever ask you to lose on purpose? do you have any clue what it means to the players on the field to win and showcase what they are capable of?  for several of them there may be millions (MILLIONS) on the line.... do you really think they are going to throw the game to PLEASE you?  if the answer to that last question is yes, you may have to be checked out by a medical professional !!!

You should go post this on the Jets message board,  I’m sure it’ll go over well

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmonjimbo Community Regular

gmonjimbo

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Disagree. There’s Lawrence. Then there’s Wilson. Then after a decent gap there’s Fields and Lance. 

That's fine. I was high on Wilson, but the injury history concerns me. Fields, I don't like Ohio State QBs they never translate to NFL game. Lance seems to have the highest potential outside of Lawrence but needs time to develop. Ultimately, I'm fine with all four prospects. I've seen enough of Bridgewater to know he is not the answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Basbear · Posted

      The guy has not coach college in ten years and in that span its greatly changed. Still take him over Davis, I want to see the presser and if billy still has fire in his eyes for college non-sense.....plus you know billy will want a multi-million staff.  This is interesting, very....... glad the old guard FINALLY steps aside......
    • LinvilleGorge
      College Basketball 2025

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • Basbear
      Processing Blue: immediate draft needs

      By Basbear · Posted

      He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
×
×
  • Create New...