Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford Available


Untouchable
 Share

Recommended Posts

Look how many games we lost last year by one possession, dump off Teddy could never get us that game winning drive. 

Stafford?  He has 38 career game winning drives, while playing for a terrible organization not set up to be in position for wins. Those 38 games rank 2nd amongst current NFL QB's, only trailing Brees.

Edited by TheProcess
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GoPanthers123 said:

That means DET drafts a QB for sure.  So with Four or so teams picking ahead of us wanting a QB we may end up without a chair when music stops.

 

 

Well that was decided when we beat Washington. The reality is we might not have a QB for another two years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AceBoogie said:

Signing Stafford is a backwards move for this team. Don’t compound a Teddy mistake with another over the hill QB that has never won anything in his life. 

Stafford is in pocket passer prime. It is not a backwards move. Teddy isnt over the hill either he just sucks.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here is my take on the win situation:

if we get:

Watson -  super bowl contenders long term solution to an issue

Stafford - playoffs, short term solution to an issues

Draft - we will see in 2 years, possible bust, possible ok, possible franchise QB.

I see trading for a QB as a lot less risky than drafting for one. If we get either of these qb’s in a draft outside of LT we need to go all in on defense, namely LB’er and CB. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheMaulClaw said:

I say nab Stafford then trade back and rebuild the interior Oline.

I would not trade back too far in this draft myself.  We may not be this high next year and we need a rookie QB for the future.  I still would take a qb with my first pick if Sewell is gone.  Use the 2 second round picks on bpa with one or both on an offensive lineman.  Profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Stanford being traded the Lions will be in the market for a QB. So that’s Jags, possibly Jets, Falcons, Lions, and perhaps Miami looking for a QB. 
 

That means we will end up reaching for a QB. So getting Stafford wouldn’t be a bad idea. He’d be a baller on the Panthers. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...