Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gantt weighs in on Deshaun Watson and Matt Stafford


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Watson has apparently made it clear he likes us and we like him too. C'mon make it happen. He WILL accept a trade to Carolina. That's obvious, get it done Fritter!

Wrong. 

Jets and Phins.  

We may be in the mix, but it certainly clear we are not in his top 2 choices. 

If wants to be a Jet over us, I say let him be a Jet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JJman Returns said:

I just don’t get the Stafford hate. It’s bizarre considering our two best QBs in franchise history are Jake Delhomme and Cam Newton and neither is even close statistically to what Stafford is (Which is not a knock towards Cam). 
 

He’s 4th among active QBs in game winning drives. Behind Brady, Brees and Roethlisberger despite him only playing 13 games in his first two seasons. He’s had no one to throw to other than Calvin Johnson and Golden Tate yet he consistently throws for 4000+ yards. Since 2011 he’s only missed 8 games and has played through numerous injuries because of a consistently bad OL. Not to mention he played under Jim Schwartz and Matt Patricia. Two poo coaches. 
 

Now considering the Colts, Patriots, Saints, Broncos, Bears and WFT could all make a play for him, I’d worry it would take quite a bit to get him. But if a couple 2nd round picks gets it done, I’d be very happy seeing him come here. We could patiently draft and develop his successor whenever we wanted. 

No hates him, he’s just not as good as his empty numbers indicate. He’s made one pro bowl in his career, he never beats winning teams and he’s the king of garbage time.

If you want to look at a microcosm of Stafford’s career warped up in a 2 week frame go back to 2017, they were 8-7 going into week 16 vs a mediocre bengals team, it was a must win game. Stafford goes out there and sh*ts the bed. Next week in a meaningless game vs the packers with Hundley starting he goes out there and throws for 300 yards and 3 TD. Plays like a beast when the opposing team is trash, plays terrible when they are good.

 

btw he’s always had good weapons. Calvin, Burleson, Tate, Marvin Jones, Galloday, some decent TE in Scheftler, Petigrew, Ebron, Hockerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris Wilson said:

I dune know what have yall the idea that these are valid points. But i don't care what we get rid of, DeShawn won't be down for long. Then, the staff is responsible to make It happen right along wth Watson cuz he is the truth

I gone read dem contracts and saw dat his contract be too much. We have no offensive line, no money to buy more. Give too much draft spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Wrong. 

Jets and Phins.  

We may be in the mix, but it certainly clear we are not in his top 2 choices. 

If wants to be a Jet over us, I say let him be a Jet. 

It'd be crazy to go from one dumpster fire of an organization to another. I mean, I realize we're no Steelers or Pats, but outside of the Texans the Jets might be the next worst organization in the league currently.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris Wilson said:

I dune know what have yall the idea that these are valid points. But i don't care what we get rid of, DeShawn won't be down for long. Then, the staff is responsible to make It happen right along wth Watson cuz he is the truth

You know wha' they say: See a broad to get that bodiac lay'er down an' smack 'em yack 'em

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It'd be crazy to go from one dumpster fire of an organization to another. I mean, I realize we're no Steelers or Pats, but outside of the Texans the Jets might be the next worst organization in the league currently.

I'm not disagreeing with you at all. 

 

Just stated what has been made public by the Watson camp. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, pantherj said:

Stafford is 32. We're still several seasons away from completing our rebuilding process. We need a younger QB imo. Stafford will go to the 49ers who are in a "win now" kind of position imo. If not the 49ers, then you plug Stafford into the Colts and they're back in the playoffs imo. He's not coming here. 

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, stbugs said:

I like the idea of extending our mediocrity on the hope that we get lucky and hit on a QB late in round 1. What if this is our last top 10 pick for a while and we continue to pick in the 15-23 range?

Going back to 1990, over the last 31 years you have “lucky” picks of Wilson and Brady that we should ignore as they weren’t mid to late first/early 2nd talents. They were just ridiculous values. In that there have been studs like Favre, Brees, Rodgers and maybe Lamar, but that’s once every 8 years basically. Then you’ve got mainly outright garbage or guys like Flacco and Carr and gasp, Teddy. 1-14 and there are tons of solid to great/possibly great (too early) QBs and tons of Flacco’s.

I don’t want to bide my time if we don’t feel like Stafford can get us to the SB knowing that it hugely restricts our chances to get “that” guy. I personally don’t think we are lucky enough to find that once every 8 years stud. If we are, it probably doesn’t matter what we do now.

Flacco won the super bowl back in 2012. You may want to exclude him from your list. 
 

He is terrible now, but a had several solid years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...