Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gantt weighs in on Deshaun Watson and Matt Stafford


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Watson has apparently made it clear he likes us and we like him too. C'mon make it happen. He WILL accept a trade to Carolina. That's obvious, get it done Fritter!

Wrong. 

Jets and Phins.  

We may be in the mix, but it certainly clear we are not in his top 2 choices. 

If wants to be a Jet over us, I say let him be a Jet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JJman Returns said:

I just don’t get the Stafford hate. It’s bizarre considering our two best QBs in franchise history are Jake Delhomme and Cam Newton and neither is even close statistically to what Stafford is (Which is not a knock towards Cam). 
 

He’s 4th among active QBs in game winning drives. Behind Brady, Brees and Roethlisberger despite him only playing 13 games in his first two seasons. He’s had no one to throw to other than Calvin Johnson and Golden Tate yet he consistently throws for 4000+ yards. Since 2011 he’s only missed 8 games and has played through numerous injuries because of a consistently bad OL. Not to mention he played under Jim Schwartz and Matt Patricia. Two poo coaches. 
 

Now considering the Colts, Patriots, Saints, Broncos, Bears and WFT could all make a play for him, I’d worry it would take quite a bit to get him. But if a couple 2nd round picks gets it done, I’d be very happy seeing him come here. We could patiently draft and develop his successor whenever we wanted. 

No hates him, he’s just not as good as his empty numbers indicate. He’s made one pro bowl in his career, he never beats winning teams and he’s the king of garbage time.

If you want to look at a microcosm of Stafford’s career warped up in a 2 week frame go back to 2017, they were 8-7 going into week 16 vs a mediocre bengals team, it was a must win game. Stafford goes out there and sh*ts the bed. Next week in a meaningless game vs the packers with Hundley starting he goes out there and throws for 300 yards and 3 TD. Plays like a beast when the opposing team is trash, plays terrible when they are good.

 

btw he’s always had good weapons. Calvin, Burleson, Tate, Marvin Jones, Galloday, some decent TE in Scheftler, Petigrew, Ebron, Hockerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris Wilson said:

I dune know what have yall the idea that these are valid points. But i don't care what we get rid of, DeShawn won't be down for long. Then, the staff is responsible to make It happen right along wth Watson cuz he is the truth

I gone read dem contracts and saw dat his contract be too much. We have no offensive line, no money to buy more. Give too much draft spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Wrong. 

Jets and Phins.  

We may be in the mix, but it certainly clear we are not in his top 2 choices. 

If wants to be a Jet over us, I say let him be a Jet. 

It'd be crazy to go from one dumpster fire of an organization to another. I mean, I realize we're no Steelers or Pats, but outside of the Texans the Jets might be the next worst organization in the league currently.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris Wilson said:

I dune know what have yall the idea that these are valid points. But i don't care what we get rid of, DeShawn won't be down for long. Then, the staff is responsible to make It happen right along wth Watson cuz he is the truth

You know wha' they say: See a broad to get that bodiac lay'er down an' smack 'em yack 'em

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It'd be crazy to go from one dumpster fire of an organization to another. I mean, I realize we're no Steelers or Pats, but outside of the Texans the Jets might be the next worst organization in the league currently.

I'm not disagreeing with you at all. 

 

Just stated what has been made public by the Watson camp. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, pantherj said:

Stafford is 32. We're still several seasons away from completing our rebuilding process. We need a younger QB imo. Stafford will go to the 49ers who are in a "win now" kind of position imo. If not the 49ers, then you plug Stafford into the Colts and they're back in the playoffs imo. He's not coming here. 

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, stbugs said:

I like the idea of extending our mediocrity on the hope that we get lucky and hit on a QB late in round 1. What if this is our last top 10 pick for a while and we continue to pick in the 15-23 range?

Going back to 1990, over the last 31 years you have “lucky” picks of Wilson and Brady that we should ignore as they weren’t mid to late first/early 2nd talents. They were just ridiculous values. In that there have been studs like Favre, Brees, Rodgers and maybe Lamar, but that’s once every 8 years basically. Then you’ve got mainly outright garbage or guys like Flacco and Carr and gasp, Teddy. 1-14 and there are tons of solid to great/possibly great (too early) QBs and tons of Flacco’s.

I don’t want to bide my time if we don’t feel like Stafford can get us to the SB knowing that it hugely restricts our chances to get “that” guy. I personally don’t think we are lucky enough to find that once every 8 years stud. If we are, it probably doesn’t matter what we do now.

Flacco won the super bowl back in 2012. You may want to exclude him from your list. 
 

He is terrible now, but a had several solid years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Beck is likely to be a Day 2 or 3 guy.
    • Schlereth calling us back to back....somebody call up Morgan!  Schlereth got that dawg in him!
    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
×
×
  • Create New...