Carolina Panthers to be 'aggressive' in pursuit of potential Deshaun Watson trade

[OneBadCat]

11 minutes ago, incamwetrust1 said:

All you guys keep saying to include our best player in Brian Burns in a trade for a qb who plays like cam did in his prime and we all saw how that ended. Keep the picks keep Burns because I remember von Miller beating the panthers in the superbowl.  Watson has maybe 3 more years playing the way he does before his body starts to break down from all the scrambling around and highlight runs while getting trucked in the process. So yes keep picks like I said and Burns and keep getting pressure on the qb and who knows maybe burns can be our von miller. KEEP BURNS 

Lmao what? Watson is not remotely the same kind of runner that Cam was. 
 

We lost SB 50 because the NFL rigged the game for Manning to get his retirement trophy. On top of Ron not giving Remmers any help. 
 

Burns is a stud but he is also the most expendable and the likely target the Texans would want in return. 
 

You attract Watson with CMC, DJ Moore, Robby Anderson, maybe the return of Curtis Samuel. 
 

You don’t attract Watson by ridding yourself of CMC, his potential #1 WR in DJ, and then still possibly lose his next #1-2 in Curtis Samuel to FA. 

[SizzleBuzz]

2 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

We lost SB 50 because the NFL rigged the game for Manning to get his retirement trophy.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

[OneBadCat]

15 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

Multiple headshots on Cam not called. The Cotchery catch on the biggest momentum play of the game. Denver offsides on two missed field goals not called. The biggest game of the year and refs can’t call a fair game. Yeah I call horseshit when I see it. 
 

We made our share of mistakes but if you can’t see the bias in that game then that’s on you bro.

Edited January 29, 2021 by OneBadCat

[PhillyB]

1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

If anyone has to go it would and should be Burns. We can generate a pass rush by committee and bring in specialists. Can’t replace the best RB in the league and the best safety we’ve had in years.

i would much rather sell CMC and his salary. burns will likely have twice as many productive years as CMC due to their respective positions.

[OneBadCat]

26 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

i would much rather sell CMC and his salary. burns will likely have twice as many productive years as CMC due to their respective positions.

I mean that’s a fair point. But you would be trading him and then looking for his replacement and we will probably not have a 1st round pick to use.

Which I guess you’d bring back Davis. CMC isn’t just another back though. He’s an LT lite for us in what he brings to the table. Great runner, excellent receiver, great blocker and keeps the defense honest. If we don’t have him then that’s like serving Watson steak and potatoes without any steak. 

If you trade CMC, then would pay top dollar to retain Curtis Samuel?

[DamnItJake!]

We offer TB, Paradis, Boston, Slye, next years 1st and a life time of free subscription to Sweet Caroline!!! I just dont think offering the farm for him is worth it... we have to many needs.. I think Stafford  is more realistic but I think we should stay away from him cuz of his injuries!! I think we should go BPA at 8 and possibly trade backup for Mac Jones I think he is like Rothburger.. just not as stout .. Jones is growing on me

Edited January 29, 2021 by DamnItJake!

[CPF4LIFE]

1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

I mean that’s a fair point. But you would be trading him and then looking for his replacement and we will probably not have a 1st round pick to use.

Which I guess you’d bring back Davis. CMC isn’t just another back though. He’s an LT lite for us in what he brings to the table. Great runner, excellent receiver, great blocker and keeps the defense honest. If we don’t have him then that’s like serving Watson steak and potatoes without any steak. 

If you trade CMC, then would pay top dollar to retain Curtis Samuel?

Its not extremely replace a running back. Stop it.

And for all the great things CMC can do its not gonna get you the wins you need to make the playoffs. Thats just the truth. 

[TheRumGone]

this is exciting!

[DaveThePanther2008]

Maybe Carolina, Houston and another team could work out a three way swap.   

I know it will be difficult but it's possible. 

[1of10Charnatives]

16 hours ago, Troys99x4 said:

Go for it.... but for the love of everything great in this world.... please don't trade away DJ or Burns.

I would be willing to trade DJ, and I like DJ a lot. Quality WR's are not that difficult to acquire in the NFL. Quality pass rushers are harder to get your hands on, so no Burns.

[CRA]

1 hour ago, incamwetrust1 said:

U guys are too funny. Trade burns or dj? For a qb who plays like cam did granted not as good as cam. Keep picks and draft a qb on rookie pay scale. U guys really want a cry baby qb who wants out when things don't go her way. Time to wake up. 

Cam and Watson don’t have similar games. 
 

 

[rippadonn]

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

Cam and Watson don’t have similar games. 
 

 

You've been paying attention. I totally agree, they are NOT the same player. Anybody claiming that hasn't been watching.

[Tepper's Chest Hair]

12 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I don't recall them winning a SB and in spite of having the best DT all time have a medicore defense.

Great point.

If you don't win a superbowl you are a failure.

If keeping 3 first round picks instead of trading for Watson doesn't get the Panthers a superbowl win, then it was the wrong move.

(Did I do it right?)

[CRA]

1 hour ago, incamwetrust1 said:

They dont? Both aren't dual threat qbs? We watching the same watson right?

Steve Young and Cam Newton didn't have the same game. 

Vick and Cam didn't have the same game. 

Vick and Rodgers don't have the same game. 

and the opposite end of the spectrum Peyton Manning and Teddy didn't play the same game. 

Just because Watson can run and Cam can run....doesn't make them similar players