Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My final offer for Deshaun

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The framework John McClain mentioned included two defensive starters.

I seriously doubt they can be talked into seeing the immense value of Shaq Thompson.

Shaq is a very good young player. He’s not quite worth the contract we gave him, but being that we would take the hit on some of that it would be a good player to pickup in a trade. They do not have to be all pro players but Shaq and Jackson would be two good assets to a team along with the draft picks 

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted

I rarely see YGM mentioned, but I think he could be considered a defensive starter with nice upside. 
 

If I wanted Watson, I’d do Chinn + YGM + 2021 1st + 2022 2nd and that’s the most I’d offer. 
 

Can’t give away too many picks if the guy you’re trading for will consume almost 1/4 of your cap space. 
 

Personally, I’d rather keep our young defensive talents, draft picks, and continue to the slower rebuild through the draft. One more year and we’re sitting pretty to make some moves with our available cap space. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

And the Texans aren't morons.

 

Actually they are, but Caserio isn't.

If anybody thinks they're going to get Watson without making a deal that hurts, they need to rethink it.

A deal that hurts wouldn’t necessarily include Burns. Burns is the most important player on the team, we are not giving him up. We have plenty of other pieces we could involve in a trade that could get us Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The framework John McClain mentioned included two defensive starters.

I seriously doubt they can be talked into seeing the immense value of Shaq Thompson.

Then Watson imo is not tradeable. That’s a massive deal with a ton of incentives.
 

The Jets for example probably aren’t giving up Darnold, #2, multiple other first and second round picks AND someone like Marcus Maye. 
 

Their roster is terrible. So if they give up all of their draft assets AND Maye then they basically have Watson with a garbage team and no ability to build. 
 

Imo the above offer beats anything the 49ers could offer. IDT they want to trade Watson in the division to the Colts and they’d probably rather trade him to the NFC than to the Broncos in the AFC (who could probably match our offer). 

Edited by unicar15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      I’m not sure people understand how fuging bad it is

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      too old, too expensive and would take draft capital
    • Carolina Cajun
      Our Next QB: The Qualifiers

      By Carolina Cajun · Posted

      I saw the list, agree Minshew would be on the list of possible guys as well as the rest of the list.  Mac Jones would probably be the highest possible target though that would require a trade. All that said, heres a darkhorse that I wouldnt be surprised...Carson Wentz.  I know he looked rough his last time out, however he was clearly pretty dangerously injured and kept playing through it.  When he was healthy in Minnesota he looked pretty fricken good.  Last full season he started he threw for 3500, 27td, 7 INT.  He did start the next season for a washington team running a scheme that does not fit him.  I think the things that Canales is looking for his QB to do, that Wentz does well.   Wentz however with his age would not be any kind of long term solution, a decent backup but more like actual competition would be needed to go into the season.  
    • Proudiddy
      Mike Kaye’s take

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      This reads as someone trying to suggest changes while treading lightly so Daddy Tepper doesn’t come down too hard on them.  Because flatly, the problem is Bryce.  I don’t think Canales is a perfect coach, but you can see the limitations in what can be called, what is called, and the amount of times Bryce fugs up plays all by himself.  Someone brought up the bootlegs being useless because there is always a free defender rushing - think about how different that play looks with a 6’2”+ QB with a strong arm and mobility.  I can’t count the number of times Bryce has thrown and missed bc he can’t see, it gets deflected, he chucks it away, or his patented run and fumble just on bootlegs and roll outs.  By percentage of those plays per player I have ever watched, Bryce has more negative plays WITHOUT A fuging DOUBT than anyone I have ever watched before.  Like an uncanny ability to fug up the simplest of things.  I have never seen anything like it.  And then, as I mentioned in the other thread, when you string those seemingly one-off plays together, and those stack over the course of a game, poo looks really disjointed.  It is Bryce.  Enough of this nebulous ass “something’s afoot!” bullshit.
×
×
  • Create New...