Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person - The Athletic - Panthers not interested in any senior bowl QBs


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

I don't agree with your boom-or-bust theory! Lance arguably has the highest upside of this class. He has strength, arm talent, good decision making, and mobility. The only things that he really needs are teaching, time and experience!

He’s thousands of throws and reads behind the other QBs in this draft. He played at a high school that didnt throw the ball so he wasn’t recruited and then went to the top D2 school who are run dominant and he only played for one year. That’s a ton of first team reps missed. He has the potential to have the highest ceiling of all the kids in this draft but kids are often protected in college. They avoiding throwing the ball a lot with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

Josh Allen was boom or bust, many at the time felt similar about Mahomes (10th overall), you can't hit a homerun if you don't swing the bat!

Give me potential and upside with + athleticism, and let the coaches do what they are paid millions to do!

You are right-I thought both were busts.   I am not good at projecting NFL talent at some positions.  So it is challenging to share my opinions amidst a sea of fuggin' experts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Isn't this the time when everyone lies and you can't take anything too seriously while teams try to not tip their hand?  Why isn't this likely more of the same??

So we are here scouting talent, but there is the awesome and insightful Joe Person--we owe him the truth.  Let's go tell him exactly what we think, while Rhule is telling reporters how great Mac Alpha Jones is. 

Person just makes stuff up.  "Panthers have a 30% chance of signing Moton"  Never gets called out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

He’s thousands of throws and reads behind the other QBs in this draft. He played at a high school that didnt throw the ball so he wasn’t recruited and then went to the top D2 school who are run dominant and he only played for one year. That’s a ton of first team reps missed. He has the potential to have the highest ceiling of all the kids in this draft but kids are often protected in college. They avoiding throwing the ball a lot with him. 

Thousands of throws and reads behind? More like hundreds, but even if that's the case, it's because they've played more. You've been consistently trying to act like Lance can't throw the ball! Good luck with that!

 

Trey Lance may have the most experience running a pro-style offense. So, there's that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Thousands of throws and reads behind? More like hundreds, but even if that's the case, it's because they've played more. You've been consistently trying to act like Lance can't throw the ball! Good luck with that!

 

Trey Lance may have the most experience running a pro-style offense. So, there's that!

Where have I written he can’t throw? There’s a select few users who get very defensive whenever you knock a prospect that they want to get behind.
 

And thousands is likely accurate. You practice the plays you run. If you are a running school you throw less. This means you throw less in practice as well. It’s a legit concern. Look at a guy like Trevor Lawrence and here is a kid who aired it out in high school and then got to air it out in college. 
 

Thats practice reps. Camp reps. And most importantly it’s game reps. 

It doesn’t help that he basically got this year off after playing one full season of football. 
 

That being said, I’ve REPEATEDLY stated I would completely understand why we would draft him. That doesn’t mean he is my ideal pick. It also doesn’t mean I don’t think he can throw. I think from a development standpoint he’s going to need more work than the others to have a big workload in the NFL throwing the ball. There are things to love about the kid and there are things that make you worry. 
 

Pro style offenses don’t limit your QB to 10 throws during the National Championship game. 

Edited by Varking
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Varking said:

Where have I written he can’t throw? There’s a select few users who get very defensive whenever you knock a prospect that they want to get behind.
 

And thousands is likely accurate. You practice the plays you run. If you are a running school you throw less. This means you throw less in practice as well. It’s a legit concern. Look at a guy like Trevor Lawrence and here is a kid who aired it out in high school and then got to air it out in college. 
 

Thats practice reps. Camp reps. And most importantly it’s game reps. 

It doesn’t help that he basically got this year off after playing one full season of football. 
 

That being said, I’ve REPEATEDLY stated I would completely understand why we would draft him. That doesn’t mean he is my ideal pick. It also doesn’t mean I don’t think he can throw. I think from a development standpoint he’s going to need more work than the others to have a big workload in the NFL throwing the ball. There are things to love about the kid and there are things that make you worry. 

He isn't wrong about this. Lance is relatively inexperienced as a QB. His dad played DB in college and the CFL and it sounds like he had a fairly non-traditional upbringing as a QB. I do like that he has a chip on his shoulder and I like that he learned at an early age how to beat defensive backs but he really is thousands of reps behind. So, even though the linked article talks about what a "natural" he is....he will still be a project because he hasn't been putting in thousands of reps like Lawrence, Fields and Wilson have. 

That is a real area of concern. The interviews and workouts are going to be huge for him. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Varking said:

Where have I written he can’t throw? There’s a select few users who get very defensive whenever you knock a prospect that they want to get behind.
 

And thousands is likely accurate. You practice the plays you run. If you are a running school you throw less. This means you throw less in practice as well. It’s a legit concern. Look at a guy like Trevor Lawrence and here is a kid who aired it out in high school and then got to air it out in college. 
 

Thats practice reps. Camp reps. And most importantly it’s game reps. 

It doesn’t help that he basically got this year off after playing one full season of football. 
 

That being said, I’ve REPEATEDLY stated I would completely understand why we would draft him. That doesn’t mean he is my ideal pick. It also doesn’t mean I don’t think he can throw. I think from a development standpoint he’s going to need more work than the others to have a big workload in the NFL throwing the ball. There are things to love about the kid and there are things that make you worry. 
 

Pro style offenses don’t limit your QB to 10 throws during the National Championship game. 

Just like at any other level of football, you do what it takes to win, and running down someone's throat is preferable every single time!

Stop with the bullshit narrative about people getting defensive. It's not true. Lance is just a prospect like all the other ones. He will get his knocks just like everyone else not named Trevor. Analysis and criticism are all a part of the process, but you seem to take offense every time someone points out counterarguments to prospects that you don't want. Your go-to argument is that some message boarders are being "defensive", but you're the one who is low-key getting the attitude. I'll say what I said the last time you accused me of being defensive: Some of you are going to rue the day that you talked poo about Trey Lance. And, I stand behind what I said. If he busts, I'll be the first to admit it. But, when he turns out to be special, I won't even have to say "I told you so", because you'll know.

For the record, I'll be content to get a potential starter. Sure, I think Lance has the highest upside, and I doubt that he's going to bust, but if we pick Wilson, Fields, or even Jones, I will trust that Rhule and company know what they're looking for and be hopeful that it all works out. Even if we don't pick a QB, I know that we will acquire one relatively soon (before Teddy's contract is up). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...