Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld: Teddy is done in Carolina


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bobcat91 said:

No it doesn't when we are talking about the NFL. Great players in college dont always translate. Im not saying he's a bad qb and I really like him.  But not for 3 #1s, several #2s and 2 defensive starters. No, he isn't worth that

Watson is a 3 pipes and a snort dream, people just need to let go of that goofy idea!

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Relevance?

he made a point that when you have a chance to grab a legitimate MVP QB you have to do it. you cant just say youre gonna build your roster first and then get one later, you arent always going to have a chance to do that. the reason its relevant is because hes absolutely correct, you can have holes in your roster but if you have an MVP caliber Qb youre always gonna be at the dance

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/02/2021 at 12:36 AM, FuFuLamePoo said:

Yeah with fuging Evans, Godwin, Gronk, Miller, a top 5 OL, and vastly improved defense. Watson was being held back by the worst defense in the league and personnel decisions within his organization are being made by a pastor.

It's crazy how people can continue to question Brady.

He's won SEVEN Super Bowls. We might never win one.

He's significantly better than Watson - thats just the facts of the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2021 at 12:56 AM, Panthers8969 said:

Tbt to all the guys on here that thought he was good bc of his 5-0 record on the saints! Zero football knowledge 

After I actually went and watched those 5 games and realized Teddy was carried by a potent Saints running game and Michael Thomas bailing Teddy out with miraculous wizardry catches, I knew it wouldn’t end well. I’m on record many times last offseason saying Teddy was no better than Kyle Allen for a much more expensive price. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think we are working ourselves into a position where we simply won't be able to roll with Teddy next year.  The whole team sport thing doesn't work that well when your starting QB knows a franchise doesn't want him. 

I think the end result will be us forcing our own hand and trading a poo ton to move up in the draft to get a QB.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I do think we are working ourselves into a position where we simply won't be able to roll with Teddy next year.  The whole team sport thing doesn't work that well when your starting QB knows a franchise doesn't want him. 

I think the end result will be us forcing our own hand and trading a poo ton to move up in the draft to get a QB.  

There are too many options for us to fail at replacing teddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

There are too many options for us to fail at replacing teddy. 

Are there?  

There is the draft? But we aren't sitting in a safe position to get one of the main 4.  We will need to move up.  Which is fine but I think we are going to work ourselves into a desperate position where a team takes us for a lot simply because we won't be able to roll with the status quo. 

Outside of a mega deal to get Watson (longshot)....we likely are just swapping band-aid QBs on par w/ Teddy and tying up more pointless money IMO.   I personally don't want any QB not named Watson that is out there.  Is there really a point to bringing those dudes in?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Are there?  

There is the draft? But we aren't sitting in a safe position to get one of the main 4.  We will need to move up.  Which is fine but I think we are going to work ourselves into a desperate position where a team takes us for a lot simply because we won't be able to roll with the status quo. 

Outside of a mega deal to get Watson (longshot)....we likely are just swapping band-aid QBs on par w/ Teddy and tying up more pointless money IMO.   I personally don't want any QB not named Watson that is out there.  Is there really a point to bringing those dudes in?  

your mind is made up it appears. There are many options at play for us. Just going to have to let it all play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...