Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If a QB isn’t there at 8... Slater is your pick


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do think this team is going to try and draft a rookie QB BUT if that’s not there, Slater is your guy

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nflmocks.com/2021/01/24/2021-nfl-draft-rashawn-slater-hidden-gem/amp/

Sewell will not slip beyond Cincy if watching SB 50 and 55 taught us anything it’s that you can’t compete without an O-Line in critical games

 

CAMVP got obliterated against Denver

Mahomes scrambled for his life and a potent offense looked pedestrian 

Sign Moton and draft Slater, you have bookend tackles for a decade possibly

move Little to guard

Paradis for another year and draft a rookie C in the later rounds

suddenly a terrible unit is starting to have life at the end of the tunnel

 

this team has gone places when they have stellar LT play (Gross was an All Pro) and Oher was in rare form during our SB run

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF we can't get "our guy" at QB, building the lines is obviously the best thing to do. I'd LOVE to finally have a Top 10 OL again.  

Doing so though, probably means we're stuck at QB and having this same conversation next year.  Realistically, a 2nd or 3rd round QB won't be our answer if we go that route. Can't trot Teddy out, so welcome aboard a bridge FA in the Fitzmagic role where our draft pick is middling again and we're trading up in the draft. Nuclear option, it's the year of Grier.  Let him play the Clausen role, suck it up, and we draft in the Top 5 in 2022 with a rebuilt OL and continually growing defense.  But, are we really going to openly regress and set the team back?  What message is that sending? 

Bottom line, half-assing the rebuild limited our options in so many ways baring a complete homerun of a draft this year.  Tepper/Hurney/Rhule/whoever screwed this team over by talking themselves into Teddy B to compete for 3rd place in the NFC South.  It's going to be a little chicken or egg scenario this year, where do we draft our QB and let him possibly get killed behind our OL, or do we build the OL and put the QB question off again

  • Pie 4
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Frankly, to be a guard, gotta have a little mean streak 

not sure Little has one of those.  As bad as those two interior guards were this past year, if he had ability, he would have been moved there 

...maybe there is something else going on with him. Who knows   Just another wasted pick by Hurney 

Yeah. Little is just a flat bust. There is no way to get around that fact. He was less effective than Rashaan Gaulden.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CarolinaNCSU said:

IF we can't get "our guy" at QB, building the lines is obviously the best thing to do. I'd LOVE to finally have a Top 10 OL again.  

Doing so though, probably means we're stuck at QB and having this same conversation next year.  Realistically, a 2nd or 3rd round QB won't be our answer if we go that route. Can't trot Teddy out, so welcome aboard a bridge FA in the Fitzmagic role where our draft pick is middling again and we're trading up in the draft. Nuclear option, it's the year of Grier.  Let him play the Clausen role, suck it up, and we draft in the Top 5 in 2022 with a rebuilt OL and continually growing defense.  But, are we really going to openly regress and set the team back?  What message is that sending? 

Bottom line, half-assing the rebuild limited our options in so many ways baring a complete homerun of a draft this year.  Tepper/Hurney/Rhule/whoever screwed this team over by talking themselves into Teddy B to compete for 3rd place in the NFC South.  It's going to be a little chicken or egg scenario this year, where do we draft our QB and let him possibly get killed behind our OL, or do we build the OL and put the QB question off again

There's no two ways to slice it, we're in a bad spot right now. We're probably on the outside looking in on the QB run at #8 while also needing to rebuild the OL. Trading to get our QB greatly impacts our ability to rebuild the OL. Using our capital to rebuild the OL basically means forgoing a QB or taking a shot in the dark at a 2nd or 3rd tier QB, be it a draft pick or a vet. We already went that vet route last year.

In the ideal world, Fields or Lance is available at #8. I'm just less and less convinced of that with each passing day with this current QB carousel going on. We have a gigantic target on our backs from teams behind us too because if one of those guys is available at #7 the Lions' phone is gonna be ringing off the hook with everyone and their brother knowing we are desperate for a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's no two ways to slice it, we're in a bad spot right now. We're probably on the outside looking in on the QB run at #8 while also needing to rebuild the OL. Trading to get our QB greatly impacts our ability to rebuild the OL. Using our capital to rebuild the OL basically means forgoing a QB or taking a shot in the dark at a 2nd or 3rd tier QB, be it a draft pick or a vet. We already went that vet route last year.

In the ideal world, Fields or Lance is available at #8. I'm just less and less convinced of that with each passing day with this current QB carousel going on. We have a gigantic target on our backs from teams behind us too because if one of those guys is available at #7 the Lions' phone is gonna be ringing off the hook with everyone and their brother knowing we are desperate for a QB.

I feel better about finding an OT in the 2nd than a QB, by most accounts it a a good tackle class.

Need to find a way to trade up without having to use this years second, maybe including a player instead of a pick. 
 

I like Brown a lot, and think he is going to become a great player, but last year did set up well for us to take a tackle in the first. 
 

I'm afraid when it is all over we are going to have to “make due” at the spot and maybe address it another time. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fixing oline in off season.  If the QB of preference is gone at 8 we trade back.  Not too far 12-18 is prime.  Then draft Alex Leatherwood.  Bama beast.  Championship pedigree.  Outland trophy winning left tackle.  Second round target is Creed Humphrey Oklahoma center who has been in the middle of a innovative offense for years.  Top center.  If Creed gets swiped earlier than our second round pick (which is very likely) Go defense.  Later in draft we keep an eye on guys like Trey Smith, Robert Jones, Adrian Ealy, Jackson Carman etc.  Big swing tackles that could play a road grading right guard too.  In free agency I have three targets. 

1.  Pat Elflein - third rounder out Ohio State.  Started 44 games at all three interior positions.  So Jack of all trades but could start at Center or left guard.

2.  Brian Winters - third round out of Kent State.  Played on Jets for years poor guy.  But solid veteran to compete with a rookie right guard.

3. Sam Tevi - late round pick by chargers but despite that has started lots on the left side.  Gritty competitor with a chip on his shoulder.  Ideal to push Little and Leatherwood.  

If we miss out on Creed I would just wait yet another year for center.  Not a fan of many of the other centers.  

Projected lineup.

LT - Leatherwood, Levi, Little

LG - Daley, Elflien

C - Paradis, Elflien

RG - Rookie, Winters

RT - Moton, Daley,

Edited by mickeye76
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

Fixing oline in off season.  If the QB of preference is gone at 8 we trade back.  Not too far 12-18 is prime.  Then draft Alex Leatherwood.  Bama beast.  Championship pedigree.  Outland trophy winning left tackle.  Second round target is Creed Humphrey Oklahoma center who has been in the middle of a innovative offense for years.  Top center in my opinion.  If Creed gets swiped earlier than our second round pick (which is very likely) Go defense.  Later in draft we keep an eye on guys like Trey Smith, Robert Jones, Adrian Ealy, Jackson Carman etc.  Big swing tackles that could play a road grading right guard too.  In free agency I have three targets. 

1.  Pat Elflein - third rounder out Ohio State.  Started 44 games at all three interior positions.  So Jack of all trades but could start at Center or left guard.

2.  Brian Winters - third round out of Kent State.  Played on Jets for years poor guy.  But solid veteran to compete with a rookie right guard.

3. Sam Tevi - late round pick by chargers but despite that has started lots on the left side.  Gritty competitor with a chip on his shoulder.  Ideal to push Little and Leatherwood.  

If we miss out on Creed I would just wait yet another year for center.  Not a fan of many of the other centers.  

I wasn't overly impressed with Leatherwood in the CFP. I think he's a good OT prospect, but I honestly think his late 1st to early 2nd draft grades from a month or so more accurately reflected where he should be drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lol. He may not be the prototype LT but he is solid. Your takes are embarrassing. IDGAF about anything in the NCAA but prospects. Still pining for Datnold is freaking hilarious. Ickey's weakness is passprotect from speed. He is smart and has room to improve a bit in his weakness but he is a beast in the run game. That's worth more than your willing to admit. I would still take him over everything since Gross so just GTFO of here with that weak and sad take. 
    • Oops. Sorry for the double post. I have been trying to finish this amid honey-do this and that for the last couple of hours.
    • First, let me say that some people aren't going to like this. Not because they don't enjoy reading a tongue-in-cheek article based on hints of truth, but because at times, this seems like a more mean-spirited version.  It also has an error regarding Tetairoa McMillan's 40 time at the NFL Combine, and the writer also somehow thinks that throwing in a standalone sentence that references Dave Canales and his past struggle with porn addiction is funny. Deadspin went through it's trials and tribulations, and many key people started and went to Defector. Defector is supposed to be an improvement, but I don't know that it is based upon this...satire? The following are snippets. On the team in general: If it still seems impossible to you that this team won five games, well, you're onto something. That mildly respectable 4-5 finish to the season only looks worse the longer you stare at it: They eked out back-to-back wins against the putrid Saints and Giants by a combined four points, and then needed overtime and a heroic Chuba Hubbard performance to beat the Cardinals. The final win of the season, Week 18's 44-38 overtime victory against a Falcons team that was trying to make the playoffs, can be counted as legitimately impressive for as long as it takes you to remember that the Falcons will always be frauds. On Dave Canales:  "Canales, meanwhile, has an alarming amount of swagger for a guy who was a few fluky late-season wins away from presiding over the worst team in the league. "The sky's the limit for this group," Canales said at the start of training camp. "This is going to be a very competitive team. I don't think people are going to want to play us by the style of football that we play. I'm expecting that." OK pal, take it easy." "The story those quotes come from is a fun read, due to how hard it strains to recast a season that was 90 percent disaster as some kind of meaningful step forward. Benching Young after Week 2, an obvious panic move that was almost certainly undertaken at Tepper's direction, is retrofitted to be "a gutsy move that defines Canales." Who needs winning seasons or division titles when you can put "Benched my QB in Week 2 and then put him back in the lineup because the other guy got injured" under the Gutsy Moves That Define Me section of a résumé. This man will have a job for life. I'm expecting that." On Bryce: "Young is entering his third season as the Panthers' starting quarterback, which is about the time you expect a guy who was drafted No. 1 overall to start demonstrating that he's capable of being the franchise savior he was selected to be. Young has 28 career starts under his belt, and it's pretty hard to find anything from those games indicating that he's going to avoid being a bust. He's thrown for more than 300 yards in a game just once, and tossed more than two TDs in a game twice. He's started 11 games in which his completion percentage was below 60 percent, and he's had 17 starts in which he couldn't crack 200 yards through the air. Beyond all that, he looks like he doesn't belong on the field. His base state is panic, he can't throw the ball downfield or to the sidelines, and he can barely hold his head upright under the weight of his helmet." On David Tepper: "David Tepper hasn't even been here for a decade and he's already threatening to go down as one of the worst owners in league history. A fanbase fully souring on an owner usually takes some time—there's a few seasons constituting a honeymoon period, then a period of excuse-making, and then the feeling starts to shift once the losing seasons and annoying quotes pile up. Tepper is an argument against the idea that familiarity breeds contempt; sometimes all you need is one look at a guy before deciding that you'd like to punch him in the face."   There's some truth here, and I'm sure that to the Negative Nancys the portrayal is spot on, but remember that this is ostensibly coming from a satirical perspective. The "truth" hurts though, and hopefully, like every season, there's still plenty of hope and optimism. At the end of the day, we just don't know how the m infusion of acquisitions and young players is going to work out.
×
×
  • Create New...