Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Rumor

Troys99x4

By Troys99x4,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Verge said:

Nope. However, I don't have a ton of information on Miami. Remember my info comes from a person on the inside of one team and what they hear within their own ring. Miami is probably not exactly vocal about what they are doing. Miami makes sense from a common sense perspective, but the question becomes are you ready to blow up your rebuild and your QB that you committed to in order to get Watson? You in that moment admit you were wrong about Tua and throw away all capital you have acquired. 

but they were also a 10-6 team last year so I could see where they talk themselves into not valuing their capital as much.

You really can make an argument either way, and honestly as an organization they could be back and forth about it also.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BigCat#1 said:

Why would SF take teddy with nothing in return. They would need teddy and a 2nd or 3rd to take on that stupid contract 

My theory---Jimmy G is going to be cut (his contract is not guaranteed) if not traded.  Teddy would give them a QB in the event they need a bridge for 1 season, then he can be cut.  I dunno--speculation

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I've said all along our biggest disadvantage is not being able to offer the Texans a QB option, unless they like Teddy, like the Jets and Dolphins can.

Three way trade that sends Jimmy G would make sense.  Maybe their GM thinks highly of him from their time together in NE.

I think we would have to add a player or pick to Teddy for 49ers to do that though.  I can't see them just trading Jimmy for Teddy straight up.  They could just wait for us to cut him if they like him.

 

maybe something like

49ers receive: Teddy B, Donte

Texans receive: Jimmy G, 2 first rounders, 2 2nds,  Shaq, Burns

Panthers receive: DESHAUN YOU fuging KNOW IT WATSON

Burns is our most important player, I wouldn’t do this, and I don’t think the team will trade him. We have enough capital elsewhere to make it work.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Verge Veteran

Verge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

but they were also a 10-6 team last year so I could see where they talk themselves into not valuing their capital as much.

You really can make an argument either way, and honestly as an organization they could be back and forth about it also.

 

Yeah makes sense. 
Tua plus two #1s would be awfully tempting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, t96 said:

Burns is our most important player, I wouldn’t do this, and I don’t think the team will trade him. We have enough capital elsewhere to make it work.

I hope you correct, I just keep thinking they are going to want a really great player on a rookie deal.  Shaq and Donte don't really fit that description.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • MHS831
      Clowney released

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • tukafan21
      Clowney released

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...