Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Nah that’s a professional sports writer. What could be possibly know about sports? 

Some folks rely on them way more than they should. Like at all. Even if the rumors sound like sweet nothings in your ears you shouldn't treat it as gospel. You have your little climax and then go on about your day.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Some folks rely on them way more than they should. Like at all. Even if the rumors sound like sweet nothings in your ears you shouldn't treat it as gospel. You have your little climax and then go on about your day.

Happy National Football League GIF by Carolina Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

How in the Holly f*ck has this thread gone this long.  Are you lazy f*cks that damn bored? 

I admit it was fun laughing through the first 15 pages but damn.  Let this crappy thread die like the career of the person this topic is about.

Teddy's career is not dead. You might be in the wrong thread, because the last I heard, Teddy was the starting quarterback of the Carolina Panthers who has to have a tremendous off season against the Carolina Panther's defense in order to keep his job.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

We're likely now to the point where they're not likely to get any sort of return on Bridgewater regardless because everybody expects them to eventually just cut him.

Are the "insiders" saying Tepper is going to cut Teddy?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Pup McBarky said:
6 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Dude, this is not some middle school clique

Exactly. So stop acting like a fuging 12-year old brat.

Says the guy who literally thinks Teddy Bridgewater might be posting in this forum...

 

...now that is ripe.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

We're likely now to the point where they're not likely to get any sort of return on Bridgewater regardless because everybody expects them to eventually just cut him.

You can't cut him without a viable replacement. 

Even if we take a first round QB odds are we're going to start Bridgewater next year. 

We'd have to sign an established vet to move on from him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...