Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Explain this to me..Saints and the cap


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

It isnt voodoo. It isn't rocket science. 

They have done what they've done for a decade and just restructured contracts to convert base pay to league minimum and spread the signing bonus out over the length of the deal. 

Void years arent anything new. They've been around forever, hell we used them on Matt Kalil and recently on Paradis.

Thats it, there's literally nothing else to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Every year this question is asked and every year Loomis works his voodoo and makes it happen. If they have a major setback this year and finish under 500, look for them to use 2022 to dump a ton of their cap problems. 

You just said it.... its every year because they just keep pushing more and more money to future years cap space think of it as buying on credit.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They restructured Hill, which will push about $8mil into future dead money. 
 

They cut about $40mil in salary, including starters (LB Kwon Alexander, WR Sanders,  CB Jenkins, TE Cook, LG Eaton, P Morstead. 
 

They also “officially” still have Brees on the roster. Once he leaves they get hit with an additional $10.4mil hit, so even though they are “only” $11 mil in the hole, they need $5mil+ for cushion throughout the year and another $8mil for rookies. 
 

So they are still about $35mil in the red for ‘21, plus they’ve restructured contracts to push money to future years. And they have no franchise QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It takes a lock of the commissioner's hair, a live chicken, two swamp toads, a gris gris bag and the most powerful Voodoun Mamba in the parish each year to keep the Saints cap rolling.

To defeat this, it's going to take an old priest, a young priest...

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, bababoey said:

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

so trading 3 #1's & multiple other picks plus young players on rookie deals for a single player is probably not a good idea?

Edited by Scott12345
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Schlereth calling us back to back....somebody call up Morgan!  Schlereth got that dawg in him!
    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
    • I really like Carson Beck’s talent level.  Needs to make better decisions sometimes but I think he could be really good.  Looks like Miami is for real.  Pitt might be interesting at the end of the year but they almost certainly win out 
×
×
  • Create New...