Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Everything the Texans have been doing over the past year or two has been insanity. This would be par for the course.

While I grant that McNair is an idiot, the Texans being behind this really just isn't very credible.

I've also seen a couple of people suggest that Tepper did it to drive his trade price down. That's just lunacy.

Setting aside the conspiracy theories though, this is an extremely sad and difficult story.

Is the lawyer at the center of this a douchebag? Probably. It's more about the women than him though. If they're credible, this is pretty bad for Watson. And if more come forward, it only gets worse.

Like I said before, this isn't really about football anymore. It's about the real lives of Watson and the women involved.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:


Why would they ever cut him?

If they see him as a sexual predator who is assaulting women he should be cut. I would imagine this kind of thing can make part of his contract voidable. From a PR stand point cutting him (if found guilty) is the right thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the allegations all seem B.S., especially, all brought by the same Plaintiff's attorney. What are the odds they all contacted his attorney. Now it is a mission for this attorney to make a killing off this. The attorney is likely recovering 40% of any settlement. The more women the more he has to gain. 

I see it too much in my line of work. Rape allegations coming out a year later??

Flying someone from Atlanta to Houston to give him a message? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Forced oral sex doesn't qualify as assault?

I don’t think it’s right of anyone to say one person is right or wrong. Have u ever of heard of people lying? I think anybody saying someone is at fault at this point is dumb as hell. We have no idea what happened and that’s it. The truth will come out, trying to say anything right now is truth is ridiculous. I can’t believe a lot of people on hear just throw someone under the bus that doesn’t know anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BurnNChinn said:

I don’t think it’s right of anyone to say one person is right or wrong. Have u ever of heard of people lying? I think anybody saying someone is at fault at this point is dumb as hell. We have no idea what happened and that’s it. The truth will come out, trying to say anything right now is truth is ridiculous. I can’t believe a lot of people on hear just throw someone under the bus that doesn’t know anything. 

Court judges do just that, and they kinda have to.

Whether it's true or not isn't the point though. This was in response to someone saying that none of the allegations qualify as assault.

Forced oral sex would definitely be considered assault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Zod said:

If he was guilty he would have taken the 100 grand settlement. That's chump change. 

 

I'm not buying it until they present the receipts. 

Chump change would have been hiring an actual escort.

I’m not saying this is true but nobody knows and will likely ever know. But there’s too many accusations just to brush it off 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I have a hard time believing that if Watson said he wanted to retire a Texan, this would've still happened.

Very possible, but it also doesn’t mean the allegations aren’t true.

Maybe Cal/Texans heard about some of this stuff going on and decided to do their own investigation. 

Once they found some dirt, they handed it over to Buzzbee when the time was right. 

Anything is possible right now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Court judges do just that, and they kinda have to.

Whether it's true or not isn't the point though. This was in response to someone saying that none of the allegations qualify as assault.

Forced oral sex would definitely be considered assault.

None of us know this it is she said/ he said at this point.  We know nothing and people trying to say on person is right or wrong at this point need to let it play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

None of us know this it is she said/ he said at this point.  We know nothing and people trying to say on person is right or wrong at this point need to let it play out.

Again, not about that.

The discussion was about a single question: Does forced oral sex qualify as sexual assault? The answer to that is yes.

Whether or not Watson is guilty of it is a whole separate discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Again, not about that.

The discussion was about a single question: Does forced oral sex qualify as sexual assault? The answer to that is yes.

Whether or not Watson is guilty of it is a whole separate discussion.

Yeah but that’s what people want to just throw out there is he is guilty that is wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...