Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Mcnair would literally lose his team overnight and then be sued into oblivion by Watson.  No effing way he would do that as some (moronic) posters are suggesting

There is no way at all McNair is paying these women or responsible for this in some way.  The timing was suspicious I admit and the lawyer is sleezy but the more info that comes out the worse it looks for Watson.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

There is no way at all McNair is paying these women or responsible for this in some way.  The timing was suspicious I admit and the lawyer is sleezy but the more info that comes out the worse it looks for Watson.

Burnnchinn thinks he is and he has links (but refuses to post them) as evidence things like this happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Calling all the accusers escorts that are lying just to make a payday does seem like an attack to me.

There are people's real lives involved here, including Watson's.

I can't understand anyone's top priority in a situation like that still being football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

I think people really need to step back and evaluate their priorities in life if you are looking to twist things and attack victims because you have some weird attachment to your football team. Deshaun Watson is not some untouchable infallible person because he is good as football, nor should that be the case. I think it might benefit everyone to really take a moment and think before you reply in this thread with some whack job conspiracy about the victims or belittle the potential assaults themselves. This is so much bigger than football, and really cements why powerful people get away with this kind of poo.

Good statement...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Verge said:

I think people really need to step back and evaluate their priorities in life if you are looking to twist things and attack victims because you have some weird attachment to your football team. Deshaun Watson is not some untouchable infallible person because he is good as football, nor should that be the case. I think it might benefit everyone to really take a moment and think before you reply in this thread with some whack job conspiracy about the victims or belittle the potential assaults themselves. This is so much bigger than football, and really cements why powerful people get away with this kind of poo.

That’s life. Life ain’t fair. People have the right to feel however they want to feel. If his name wasn’t Deshaun Watson we wouldn’t even be talking about this. This is a football forum at the end of the day. Y’all don’t want to have the real bigger than football conversations so stop cherry picking. 

Edited by AceBoogie
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Besides, literally all good lawyers have a bit of sleaziness to them... that’s kinda the point 

True, and a lot of successful ones are a--holes (I say this as someone who's met my fair share).

Heck, in some cases - like if you're going up against a rich, famous, super popular person - you might need somebody who's a little bit full of sh-t. A more sober, cautious attorney could suggest just settling for whatever you can get (or just dropping it entirely) whereas a bombastic a--hole might turn it into a personal crusade.

As to the attorney in this case, he's definitely not somebody I'd want to work with, but it's not my situation.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Again, some of the women involved in this story are state licensed massage therapists. As was pointed out, that's not an easy thing to become. And if it were true, that would be a pretty easy thing to figure out.

you can be a licensed massage therapist and also an escort

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

That’s life. Life ain’t fair. People have the right to feel however they want to feel. If his name wasn’t Deshaun Watson we wouldn’t even be talking about this. This is a football forum at the end of the day. Y’all don’t want to have the real bigger than football conversations so stop cherry picking. 

Yikes.

 

1 minute ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Find it hard to believe nine victims couldn't find a lawyer without a history of faking texts, then texts are supposedly the big evidence. Seems fishy and worthy of scrutiny. 

Yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Yikes.

 

Yikes.

I can be skeptical of this one case in particular while also thinking sexual assault is a big deal. Does the fact this lawyer and the owner being neighbors, and the lawyer has a rep for fabricating texts not matter orrr? Bc it adds some "let's wait and see" context for me. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...