Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There is still a lot of value in Free Agency.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-100-best-available-nfl-free-agents-remaining-2021-nfl-free-agency

 

Who knows who we're going to end up with, but we have options. None will be obvious slam dunks,but players like Mackenzie Alexander, Jacquiski Tartt, Breshaud Breeland, Keanu Neal, Malik Hooker and more than a few others at WR or perhaps an old guy at TE could help us this year to focus on the BPA during this year's draft. If we hit paydirt, maybe we can look into longer terms.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We may be waiting for the next rush of signings to find the next value level. 

I've got my eye on Jaquiski Tartt S and/or Quinton Dunbar CB

I think Corn is an RFA so maybe we bring him back, would actually really like to see him back.

Offense wise:

WR: Josh Reynolds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 team is probably looking to go safety in the draft, rhule got pretty attached to some guys at the senior bowl, unless they plan on playing Chinn more at LB and they need both spots, which I think would be a mistake

You can move Chinn around as much as you want but when it's all said and done he needs to be primarily classified as a safety

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

With the way things have fallen so far through free agency, outside of drafting a QB, I think Kyle Pitts makes a lot of sense as BPA. Possibly a CB if we don't address that in free agency. 

Kyle Pitts is the BPA.. but Joe Brady Offense does not respect TE... Someone tell Joe Kyle Pitts is a WR or somthen ... if we can get wilson or lance and Pitts I’d pay a Watson trading price for it !!!!!

Edited by Leotiger
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...