Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers signing WR David Moore

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheProcess Rising Star

TheProcess

Posted
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Not slept on over here. He got some attention in the senior bowl. Finishes mean. Athletic. I feel like his height pushes him down to the 5th or later.

If he was available at the end of round 4, I am trading up to make sure I get him. Height isn't ideal, but that arm length is

Edited by TheProcess
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moo Daeng Experienced

Moo Daeng

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Depends on what he does. He's a WR4 tbh that may be able to play the 3.  It's average. 

He was Seattle's 3 in yards and tds.

Those aren't positions they are fantasy terms. He seems to play a variety of actual receiver positions int terms of x,z, etc with some recerses and handoffs like Curtis did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

He was Seattle's 3 in yards and tds.

Those aren't positions they are fantasy terms. He seems to play a variety of actual receiver positions int terms of x,z, etc with some recerses and handoffs like Curtis did.

Not saying that this really means a whole lot, as they may have just been trying to upgrade on the cheap, but Seattle did acquire Josh Gordon as their 3, but of course he just fuged it up. I think they gave Moore an opportunity to be that guy, but for whatever reason he just never got the overall production. If you look at his stats, they're very much pedestrian. Now it could've been his situation, or maybe Wilson just didn't need to rely on  him as much, but I wouldn't expect the guy to legitimately move the chains like Samuel. I know Seattle runs a lot, but so do we (or at least we used to). Maybe Moore is on the verge of a breakout, but I've seen him play and I see him as more of a JAG receiver who has his few moments. This is not to take away from what he does, but I think his salary reflects my thinking about him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, top dawg said:

Not saying that this really means a whole lot, as they may have just been trying to upgrade on the cheap, but Seattle did acquire Josh Gordon as their 3, but of course he just fuged it up. I think they gave Moore an opportunity to be that guy, but for whatever reason he just never got the overall production. If you look at his stats, they're very much pedestrian. Now it could've been his situation, or maybe Wilson just didn't need to rely on  him as much, but I wouldn't expect the guy to legitimately move the chains like Samuel. I know Seattle runs a lot, but so do we (or at least we used to). Maybe Moore is on the verge of a breakout, but I've seen him play and I see him as more of a JAG receiver who has his few moments. This is not to take away from what he does, but I think his salary reflects my thinking about him.

Moore play a lot less because of Metcalf, Lockett, and Baldwin that use to be there but still put up 13 tds last three years. Samuel play a lot more last two years but doesn’t have a lot more production. Hell of a deal I love it, definitely wouldn’t pay Samuel what he wanted that’s crazy 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

Moore play a lot less because of Metcalf, Lockett, and Baldwin that use to be there but still put up 13 tds last three years. Samuel play a lot more last two years but doesn’t have a lot more production. Hell of a deal I love it, definitely wouldn’t pay Samuel what he wanted that’s crazy 

I wouldn't say it's crazy, we just couldn't afford him. Samuel played more because he's a more versatile and dynamic player! Good receivers will find their way on to the field (under most coaches). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, top dawg said:

I wouldn't say it's crazy, we just couldn't afford him. Samuel played more because he's a more versatile and dynamic player! Good receivers will find their way on to the field (under most coaches). 

Agreed as good as Samuel was he wasn't going to be more than our #3 and with a healthy CMC that is more realistically our #4.... I really liked Curtis going back to Ron Rivera ball and Scott Turner I doubt he lives up to the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Disturbing

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • KSpan
      Eric Collins Calling First NFL Game (ours)

      By KSpan · Posted

      Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • PleaseCutStewart
      Disturbing

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...