Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?

Sasquatch

By Sasquatch,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I mean if Tepper and the organization have made it known they want a QB and have been in on a few big name QBs mentioned in TRADE talks, what makes anyone think they wont TRADE up in the draft to get a guy? They offered 8 for Stafford, they might consider moving up

Those are proven commodities though but I’m not necessarily opposed to trading up if they like a prospect that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ImaginaryKev Grand Master

ImaginaryKev

Posted
Posted

The people I've seen on pff, ESPN, Twitter, nfl writers all seem to think Wilson or Fields both would go 1 in other years without the presence of a John Elway prospect like Lawrence, and Fields just ran a 4.41 for a QB. They pass the eye test, right now it seems like overanalysis is the issue Fields is facing (considering people are trying to say he maybe can't read defenses when his offense has nfl dudes and the routes take a while to develop) but I guess we'll seeeee

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we could get Stafford talent level we'd be trading up for sure. Dude was a former #1 overall pick who has thrown for over 45k yards and nearly 300 TDs and you're implying that would be settling? LOL!

Not sure where you’re getting that I’m implying that at all.

Stafford was our first target. There are no guarantees that any of these rookies will be on his level. 
 

How many rings does Stanford have, btw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bronn said:

Not sure where you’re getting that I’m implying that at all.

Stafford was our first target. There are no guarantees that any of these rookies will be on his level. 
 

How many rings does Stanford have, btw?

If rings are the only standard then you're implying a lot of great players weren't good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • raleigh-panther
      Who will blow it Sunday?

      By raleigh-panther · Posted

      They are 1 and 9 against the  Bucs in the past 10 games. the Panthers go as young goes.  QB1 ‘s are suppose to dictate and overcome  and elevate Everything the QB does affects every part of the team and Bryce is uneven. Canales and Bryce have  an uneven relationship too  as for Evero, the only thing that might save him is the injury to Baker’s left shoulder and oline injuries. I don’t even know how he is out there   I really feel their season ended last Sunday Canales’ division record isn’t great   Getting owned by the Saints and Bucs isn’t a good look 
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Who will blow it Sunday?

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      D....All of the above 
    • Jacabee
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Jacabee · Posted

      Frankly surprised by the amount of people that want to hang Evero. This was a defense that was almost universally considered the bottom of the barrel before this season started. We’ve managed to stat our way to the middle of the pack whatever that means. Those critical of the zone schemes, what do you want? When even JC is getting burnt one on one by Olave you have little choice. There definitely have been moments where the zone blitz stuff has bit us. That said, are the third string linebackers (and nick Scott) covering poo anyway? This unit had only conceded 10 points going into the fourth quarter despite a litany of bullshit penalties on both sides. Them over performing is the biggest reason we are still in playoff contention. 
×
×
  • Create New...