Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Pitts as a WR/TE Good for Carolina ?


Leotiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Varking said:

I’m a Gator homer. I just don’t see Trask as an elite NFL QB. As you said, the arm strength isn’t horrific but it is lesser and he doesn’t have much in the way of mobility. He needs elite weapons or a great line to give him time to make reads. Grimes should go well before the 6th.

I'll say this: Jones at 8 vs Trask in the 3rd, I take Trask all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trask has an arm but he's more technical and goes through his reads very quickly, has a very high release point with a very quick release. THATS how he got 4300 yrds 43TDs and only 8INTS playing against the best college teams, Bama, LSU.

The Steelers see Trask as a 6'5" 240lb Big Ben replacement. He won't be there in the third and will not make it through the second if he gets past the Steelers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet. I hope ATL takes him at 4. Lawrence, Wilson, Mac, Pitts, leaves both Fields and Lance with 3 picks until us. We could trade with the Bengals at 5 or Dolphins at 6 to get Fields/Lance which hopefully wouldn’t cost too much since it’s only 3/2 spots...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Trask has an arm but he's more technical and goes through his reads very quickly, has a very high release point with a very quick release. THATS how he got 4300 yrds 43TDs and only 8INTS playing against the best college teams, Bama, LSU.

The Steelers see Trask as a 6'5" 240lb Big Ben replacement. He won't be there in the third and will not make it through the second if he gets past the Steelers.

Love Trask but Pitts helped a lot of those stats out .. still think he is a solid qb but not the qb we are trying to go all in around 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Leotiger said:

Love Trask but Pitts helped a lot of those stats out .. still think he is a solid qb but not the qb we are trying to go all in around 

Pitts had like 750yrds this year iirc.

4300-750=3550 yrds

 

That's still pretty damn good even without Pitts, much better than most of his peers.

He may not be flashy but he's a much better QB than teh huddle gives credit for. Another one of those QBs people will be wondering about why he wasn't picked by the genius bottom feeder NFL teams.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, he either plays well or we suck again and get the #1 pick and get our new QB for next year.  Im not stressing. 
    • the way it should be. the way it has to be.  when you get a rookie (no matter where he is drafted), you don't expect him to play like a vet or even get a grasp on NFL offenses like a vet. if you intend to have him running the offense, you build the offense around what they do and what clicks.  not Young's fault, but he was sold as someone who would be a rookie but has the mind of a seasoned vet. guess what...he wasn't. reich and "his" crew had no idea how to work with a rookie QB or groom one. they thought they knew, but they didn't and it was obvious in the lack of plan they had for him. their plan was to treat him like he was a seasoned vet. even with that, i don't think they had any clear vision not just with Bryce, but with the offense. There was no cohesion between all the various coaches. nothing fit together and reich wasn't a strong enough leader to pull it all together.  i like the approach of starting over with the fundamentals and i think it's good for any new coaching staff or new QB to a system. you don't know what to expect so you start from the beginning to make sure you're on the same page from the beginning. and as you get more used to each other, you learn what works, what could really work well, and what won't work and you form the playbook around that. contrast that with chud who had been working on a playbook for years and just wanted to use it regardless of whether the situation called for it or the personnel he had (on the team or even on the field) fit what he wanted to call.   or last year when we had coaches from completely different backgrounds trying to put something together that was supposed to be a blend of what each brought to the table, but just ended up being a sloppy predictable mess that didn't fit anyone on the team, QB, WRs, and OL.
    • I've always been super pumped up for the upcoming season but I've never been so uninterested in a new season. After six years under Dipper I've been left at end of season drunken and wallowing in my own piss... not invested in the team right now but hope Canales and Morgan make a good team together...
×
×
  • Create New...