Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What was the boldest move this franchise has made?


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bold as in, "Woah, that's an aggressive move and maybe not one a lot of other franchises would've made" type bold?

Honestly, probably giving up two 1st rounders to sign Sean Gilbert to a massive contract out from under the Redskins' franchise tag.

Bold doesn't always work out well.

Speaking of bold not working out well....

 

Signing Bridgewater to his deal after he just found success with a rival was bold. Imagine if he had come in and proven he was our QB for the next 6+ years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Trading a future first to move up and grab Everette Brown. Yet another example of aggressive/bold not always working out. It’s my opinion that it flops more often than not for these sorts of examples. 

Let me also add drafting a QB converted to WR from a DII school in the second round. What an awful pick that was 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bold as in, "Woah, that's an aggressive move and maybe not one a lot of other franchises would've made" type bold?

Honestly, probably giving up two 1st rounders to sign Sean Gilbert to a massive contract out from under the Redskins' franchise tag.

Bold doesn't always work out well.

That was the first thought that popped into my head.  HATED it then, still mad.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...