Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Cosell talking QB's.


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bythenbrs said:

Really interesting interview.  If Fields or Lance aren't available at 8, take the sure thing in Sewell/Slater and then trade back up into bottom of first for Davis Mills?

I think we'll end up with one of the top five QBs.  Its seems the question marks that some teams may have will drop one or two of these QBs to us.

Not saying I wouldn't take Fields at 8 if he were available but this is the second time I have heard about Fields ability to go through his progression.  We don't need a Colin Kaepernick on steroids.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.  About Darnold---he had the same lower-body mechanics issues in college, and now, entering his 4th NFL season, he may be unlikely to change. And Fields--I see the Cam comparisons, I have made them myself--but I also see some Vince Young in him. 

I am really warming to the idea (as opposed to trading at least 2 picks to move up from 8 for the 4th or 5th best QB in the draft) of trading down and grabbing Mills.  Stay with Teddy for a year, and develop the weapons and protection.  And develop Mills in your system--or Mond, but Mond was not mentioned here. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think we'll end up with one of the top five QBs.  Its seems the question marks that some teams may have will drop one or two of these QBs to us.

Not saying I wouldn't take Fields at 8 if he were available but this is the second time I have heard about Fields ability to go through his progression.  We don't need a Colin Kaepernick on steroids.  

Not to be a contrarian, but there are just as many analysts who show tape that shows he does  

If he is there and he is taken, I’d be thrilled 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'd be supportive too because  Fitterer and Rhule have determined that he will perform. 

I’ve always liked Greg. He had many fine things to say about Justin and Trey 

I’d feel great about either.  It’s time for the Panthers to stop getting scraps off the scrap heap

If Brady and Rhule are the geniuses our genius owner thinks they are, they should have no problem molding one of the two to nfl level competition....you know, with a full year under their belts 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I’ve always liked Greg. He had many fine things to say about Justin and Trey 

I’d feel great about either.  It’s time for the Panthers to stop getting scraps off the scrap heap

If Brady and Rhule are the geniuses our genius owner thinks they are, they should have no problem molding one of the two to nfl level competition....you know, with a full year under their belts 

Yes I agree.  His takes were very unbiased and explained it well.  Especially how he explained the difference between Mahomes arm and Wilson's arm.

If it is Fields that drops to us we need to be certain we aren't getting, as I stated before, Colin Kaepernick 2.0. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Yes I agree.  His takes were very unbiased and explained it well.  Especially how he explained the difference between Mahomes arm and Wilson's arm.

If it is Fields that drops to us we need to be certain we aren't getting, as I stated before, Colin Kaepernick 2.0. 

The progression thing is an unknown. We don’t know how he was coached.

His tendency to only throw once a guy is open is also concerning, but that could have been a coaching thing too.
 

That was always a huge weakness for Cam. He converted it up sometimes with his ability to throw fast balls, but it held him back.

I do think there is a good chance some team (maybe us) is spreading these doubts about fields in an attempt to lower his draft stock.

Personally, I like Fields and think he’s worth a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tbe said:

The progression thing is an unknown. We don’t know how he was coached.

His tendency to only throw once a guy is open is also concerning, but that could have been a coaching thing too.
 

That was always a huge weakness for Cam. He converted it up sometimes with his ability to throw fast balls, but it held him back.

I do think there is a good chance some team (maybe us) is spreading these doubts about fields in an attempt to lower his draft stock.

Personally, I like Fields and think he’s worth a shot.

I won't discuss Lawrence as he's a Jaguar. Not doubts about it. Of the remaining "top 5" prospects, I honestly only want to of them For the Panthers. Wilson and Lance. If we traded up with the Jets I would be thrilled as long as we don't give more than the 49ers did to get 3. I think Wilson would flourish with us and quickly, I really do. Or I'd prefer to take Lance at 8 but if necessary I'd be ok with moving up 1-3 spots for him. I think he would flourish here as well but would need a little more time probably. However, long term he may be the better of the 2 for us. I don't think Jones is a good fit as we don't want a game manager. Fields has some qualities that we'd want, definitely more than Jones but I just don't think he will be able to do all the things we will be asking him to do in this offense. Listening to the interview it seemed to me that Cosell wasn't really high on him either. After years of a great athlete but average QB I don't want that again. I think Lance's QB skills are much better and that's why I'd would take him over Fields. If our only choice was Fields or Jones at 8, I would honestly pass on both and either get my LT or trade down a few spots and still get my LT. For me it's Wilson, Lance or LT. Anything else and I will be ok but not really happy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...