Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

POV: You are Joe Brady. What do you want in the draft?


CanadianCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

If I’m Brady my head is on a HC job. So I don’t want a rookie QB with first years struggles. I would want Pitts or a LT to give Darnold more time to throw.

If I am probably looking at making myself look good for a HC gig, I don't think I would want Sam Darnold either.

I certainly hope his main focus isn't getting a new job. That wouldn't bode well for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

We all know Joe Brady is hot future head coach candidate. (Lets be honest, everyone is it in for themselves. He wants to be a HC. So what helps him the most?)

 

So if you are him, wanting to become a HC, what are you pounding the table for to build your resume?

 

 

Kyle Pitts...point blank. 

 

Generational talent at TE to go with Moore, Anderson, and CMC. That position is what we were missing on late game drives and he's pretty much the only capable choice to make a big impact in 2021-22.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, PandaMan said:

Yeah.  We have weapons and would’ve won more games last year with better QB play.  Teddy only started 4 of our wins.  So get an LT and pray that Sam is decent, or at least better than Teddy.  

We would've won more games with a quality TE as well. You go Pitts, Sewell, or Chase. I'm not a fan of trading back out of the top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...