Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To all Sewell hopefuls


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, stbugs said:

But that doesn’t mean Flowers (their LG) being traded equals taking Sewell. I’m not saying they won’t take Sewell but that this news has nothing to do with taking him.

I mean it could mean they are taking Sewell, but I seriously doubt it.

The thinking behind the Sewell talk for Miami.....

Last year in Miami

LT - Jackson

LG - Flowers

C - Karras

RG - Kindley

RT - Hunt

In the Sewell scenario after Flowers was traded, Kindley would move to LG where he played in college, and Hunt would move down to RG. They also lost Karras in FA but signed Skura.

With Sewell

LT - Jackson

LG - Kindley

C - Skura

RG - Hunt

RT - Sewell

Having Tua as a lefty puts Sewell at RT protecting the blind side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

I mean it could mean they are taking Sewell, but I seriously doubt it.

The thinking behind the Sewell talk for Miami.....

Last year in Miami

LT - Jackson

LG - Flowers

C - Karras

RG - Kindley

RT - Hunt

In the Sewell scenario after Flowers was traded, Kindley would move to LG where he played in college, and Hunt would move down to RG. They also lost Karras in FA but signed Skura.

With Sewell

LT - Jackson

LG - Kindley

C - Skura

RG - Hunt

RT - Sewell

Having Tua as a lefty puts Sewell at RT protecting the blind side.

I read on the athletic I think is that Miami is trying to come away with Chase and Etienne in the first.  That would super charge their offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

Miami is taking Chase or trading back taking Smith/Waddle!

Good question as to which the are thinking.  I think they originally traded out of 3 and then back into 6 because they were looking at receivers, and there are three marquis wideouts and Pitts available.  They didn't need the #3 pick, so they parlayed it into more picks to address more needs.

Right now they have two picks in the first (6 and 18) and four in the top 50 (add 36 and 50). 

4 hours ago, MHS831 said:

fwiw

Miami Newspaper poll:
image.thumb.png.1a61c35bfdc36ce5e5063db953e2e192.png

 

They have a chance to get one of the top WRs in some time (Chase) or Waddle.  They can get a T later.

That is pretty much inline with the consensus I have seen on their needs.  Now imagine them with another 2nd or 3rd rounder and a slightly lower first pick.  They could wind up with two new receivers and filling the other needs all by pick 50.  They would probably want any picks beyond that (for potentially moving down) in 2022.

Barring a Hurney moment, they are going to be more talented a week from now than they are today, at least on paper. 

Edited by Sgt Schultz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...