Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To all Sewell hopefuls


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, stbugs said:

But that doesn’t mean Flowers (their LG) being traded equals taking Sewell. I’m not saying they won’t take Sewell but that this news has nothing to do with taking him.

I mean it could mean they are taking Sewell, but I seriously doubt it.

The thinking behind the Sewell talk for Miami.....

Last year in Miami

LT - Jackson

LG - Flowers

C - Karras

RG - Kindley

RT - Hunt

In the Sewell scenario after Flowers was traded, Kindley would move to LG where he played in college, and Hunt would move down to RG. They also lost Karras in FA but signed Skura.

With Sewell

LT - Jackson

LG - Kindley

C - Skura

RG - Hunt

RT - Sewell

Having Tua as a lefty puts Sewell at RT protecting the blind side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

I mean it could mean they are taking Sewell, but I seriously doubt it.

The thinking behind the Sewell talk for Miami.....

Last year in Miami

LT - Jackson

LG - Flowers

C - Karras

RG - Kindley

RT - Hunt

In the Sewell scenario after Flowers was traded, Kindley would move to LG where he played in college, and Hunt would move down to RG. They also lost Karras in FA but signed Skura.

With Sewell

LT - Jackson

LG - Kindley

C - Skura

RG - Hunt

RT - Sewell

Having Tua as a lefty puts Sewell at RT protecting the blind side.

I read on the athletic I think is that Miami is trying to come away with Chase and Etienne in the first.  That would super charge their offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

Miami is taking Chase or trading back taking Smith/Waddle!

Good question as to which the are thinking.  I think they originally traded out of 3 and then back into 6 because they were looking at receivers, and there are three marquis wideouts and Pitts available.  They didn't need the #3 pick, so they parlayed it into more picks to address more needs.

Right now they have two picks in the first (6 and 18) and four in the top 50 (add 36 and 50). 

4 hours ago, MHS831 said:

fwiw

Miami Newspaper poll:
image.thumb.png.1a61c35bfdc36ce5e5063db953e2e192.png

 

They have a chance to get one of the top WRs in some time (Chase) or Waddle.  They can get a T later.

That is pretty much inline with the consensus I have seen on their needs.  Now imagine them with another 2nd or 3rd rounder and a slightly lower first pick.  They could wind up with two new receivers and filling the other needs all by pick 50.  They would probably want any picks beyond that (for potentially moving down) in 2022.

Barring a Hurney moment, they are going to be more talented a week from now than they are today, at least on paper. 

Edited by Sgt Schultz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...