Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Bowl record of teams with turf on their home fields since 2010


PhillyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

huh?

Don’t mind him. I don’t agree with you on everything you align with politically but this guy is somehow trying to politicize grass... and not the grass the needs to be legalized in the state or NC. No, he’s trying to politicize the grass the Panthers play on. The draft needs to hurry the fug up and get here man.

Edited by TheMostInterestingMan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Growl said:

you think that because it’s new it’s progressive and thus are apologizing for inherently unprogressive things
 

turf isn’t helping teams win super bowls

Looks like you are trying to veer into another discussion with that first statement, but to your second...turf definitely isn't a detriment to teams getting in and winning superbowls. Grass is better for health and aesthetics, but it won't interfere with our chances to win.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PhillyB said:

Which is dumb, but on par for Carolina, a fanbase known to prefer gutty 7-9 seasons with a lunchpail quarterback doing things the traditional way. So it goes.

Yes, of course. All other fanbases have the correct take 100% of the time and their management never make a decision that looks bad in hindsight. Thank you for your valued input and for trashing an entire fanbase.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

Yes, of course. All other fanbases have the correct take 100% of the time and their management never make a decision that looks bad in hindsight. Thank you for your valued input and for trashing an entire fanbase.

huh

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

....60% chance of going to the SB by having turf......

 

The other glaring analytic I saw is that over the past 10 years you had a 60% chance of being in the SB if TB12 was your quarterback!

 

If we had him and turf, that’s like a 120% chance of winning......Right?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PhillyB said:

the only owner in the nfl to do so, undoubtedly 

TBH, I trust Tepper to build the Panthers brand. If turf, a dome, a new stadium... whatever he wants to do makes the panthers more popular, successful.. helps the city grow..  

..I'm all for it. 

 

Let the guy that grows money on trees grow the Panthers accordingly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To kick this up, The Athletic has a really comprehensive piece out where pretty much all QB questions are addressed. It is worth seeing.  https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7083539/2026/03/04/starting-quarterback-projections-free-agency-draft/?source=user_shared_article I’m putting something specific here but it should have a thread or something. It is an extensive exercise.  This is a dense write up with a lot of column inches used, about the Jets and Murray and Reich, all this stuff.. then it goes to backup QB and there is Dalton.  I am pasting that part: As for Dalton, Reich is installing the offense he was trying to run in Carolina in 2023 before he got fired, and Dalton was with the Panthers then; he’s an ideal option as a veteran backup to replace Taylor. Reich said this about Dalton in 2023: “The way he's throwing the football, the way he works through progressions, the way he handles the operation. … Since day one (when) he walked in the door, I'm like, 'This guy is starter-worthy.' You guys know I've said that all along. He's, in my opinion, one of the best 32 quarterbacks in the world.” ——— That’s true love lol. I never heard any of this. Pretty crazy I think, considering how the year went.   Anyway the dream is not dead. . 
    • The Seahawks traded for wide receiver/returner Rashid Shaheed at the trade deadline. He proved to be a key acquisition. Shaheed returned a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns in the regular season and had a 95-yard kickoff return in the postseason. Shaheed, though, is scheduled for free agency. So, the 12 games he played, including the postseason, might be the extent of his time in Seattle. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that Shaheed and the Seahawks are not close to an extension, and the expectation is that the two-time Pro Bowler will hit free agency. Shaheed has 153 receptions for 2,243 yards and 12 touchdowns in his four-year career to go along with three punt return touchdowns and a kickoff return touchdown. He ranks 13th on PFT’s top-100 free agents. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/report-rashid-shaheed-appears-headed-to-free-agency
×
×
  • Create New...