Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How would you feel if we traded 8 to the Pats and they take Fields???


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

Seriously though, your extra comment in the OP makes this question completely retarded. Of course every single Panthers fan would be pissed in that scenario, but it's a highly unlikely "what if." 

We could trade down with the Pats today and they could take Fields and whoever we take could wind up being a perennial All-Pro and Fields could wind up busting. We'd all be happy in that scenario. 

My thoughts on this trade happening today would depend on what picks we get in the trade and who we take, but ultimately I trust Rhule and company and we'd just have to wait to see how it plays out. If we pass up on Fields I'll be a bit disappointed since I really like him but I'll be fine with it as I trust Brady/Rhule and if they don't love Fields then I have no issues with them not forcing the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, firefox1234 said:

Only if we fleece them and i don’t mean securing a future 1st round pick, that is simply the bare minimum that should be in such a deal.

Yeah in a trade down scenario where the team we trade with is getting a QB we need it to be a fleecing. These types of trades ALWAYS are at the time. We should be getting a future 1st, this year's 2nd and more frankly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked him when he was at Michigan because I'm a Wolverine homer. After that... 
    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
×
×
  • Create New...