Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
Just now, jb2288 said:

What does this even mean? The team will exist in 2022 this is how great teams operate 

Listen, I love the player we picked, I said it earlier, but don't pretend it's a need. Receiver is arguably the most stacked position group on the team, and there's no reason to assume we're not going to either resign our receivers next off-season, or find one in free agency — again next off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FuFuLamePoo Mentor

FuFuLamePoo

Posted
Posted
Just now, Krovvy said:

Okay, just checking. You think that adding a player to the most stacked position group qualifies as "filling a need", and that getting ahead of free agency a year from now is apart of filling that need.

Of course. You literally need like 3-4 good receivers to make a run today.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
Just now, FuFuLamePoo said:

Hurney truly broke fans' brains. How dare the team think one year ahead of time!

Well then state that please. Adding a player to the most stacked position on a team isn't a "filling a need", it's stacking a group to the point that losing players an entire year later will be okay.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monrowed Grand Master

Monrowed

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

How beautiful is this. Two needs already filled tonight with two more picks to go. Do you all want to keep complaining?

Yes no other teams realized that they should have been the first two picks in the second round. We are so coy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
Just now, FuFuLamePoo said:

Of course. You literally need like 3-4 good receivers to make a run today.

We have two great one, and one with good production in his career at third. We also have a running back that take a huge load off the receivers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

Listen, I love the player we picked, I said it earlier, but don't pretend it's a need. Receiver is arguably the most stacked position group on the team, and there's no reason to assume we're not going to either resign our receivers next off-season, or find one in free agency — again next off-season.

I can’t agree with a single point you made in this post so I will respect your opinion and we will just disagree on this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Mike Tomlin stepping down as HC of the Steelers

      By frankw · Posted

      We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • Joe Bear
      Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • DeAngelo Beason
      Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)

      By DeAngelo Beason · Posted

      I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...