Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

If Christensen actually ends up being a Gross level LT then we can shuffle LG and RG until we find serviceable dudes I guess. Can't have all stars at every position it's not realistic 

I mean fug it, with how quickly we get the ball out, if Christensen just has to be serviceable at LT for it to work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

How often were Armah, Thomas and Manhertz on the field?

Right now he's TE2, but already a better blocker than Arnold so I suspect he'll be in a lot on obvious running downs. Arnold is your redzone TE though. 

Tremble doesn’t have bad hands either, He is just not developed as much as a second rounder would be. He could develop into good pass catching TE if allowed to develop.
 

Not sure why folks on here would want pick Lance in the first as a developmental project but not on a third round TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

Do you really think he can be that?

Lol that's a homer take. Christensen is a nice prospect but yes old for a college guy and short arms. Inside, I think he's fine to plus guy.

 

Still think they are looking for a guy to develop as a backup in 2021, and start in 2022. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Jordan, Yeboah, Mckitty, and Gray ALL where better TEs. Using a value asset to replace fuging Chris Manhentez.  Worst 3rd round pick in the draft.

Look at my avatar.

Tremble has more potential than Jordan and plays with way more fire. 

I do like Yeboah a pure receiving TE though. McKitty did jack poo at two colleges. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

Lol, we need OL, that would have been a great way to stock up. No one cares what you think here. We are stating what we think. How about you bring up a better idea? You actually think that a potential starting T or G/C is less valuable that using a 3rd to replace Manhertz? Maybe you buy that Elflein and Erving are solid OL n

Are you so certain that Dan Arnold is a legitimate full-time starter? I think Tremble has a ways to go, but I think it's worthwhile to gamble on the upside.

It is clear the personnel guys don't think OL is a dire need. Christiansen, Erving, Daley, Elflein, Miller, Moton, Scott. That's 7 guys that are really likely to make the roster for 5 starting spots. How many more are they going to realistically add? Who was going to be a sure starter over the best 5 of those 7 in the 80s? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

There goes Mienerz, but hey, we got a new H-back!!!!

Dudes gonna be more than that eventually. Even just watching YouTube cut ups of all his receptions he’s got strong hands, leaps to make contested catches and some diving catches. He has a ton of talent. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes message boards will always include that sort of stuff… However, this place has been a cess pool since the team took Bryce Young over CJ Stroud. It becomes a problem when it is accepted and promoted, which it has been here (even by at least one mod). Many posters sole purpose on this board is to try to dunk on others for having different opinions. We just had one write a novella on how talking about Bryce Young’s game winning drives “needs to stop”…after a win. They don’t want real conversation. It “needs to stop”. There are many posters here who literally only show up after losses to dead thread and try to dunk on others about the QB (MRenshaw is an easy example). I really don’t see much of that happening the other way around. There’s too many people that would rather the team be bad so they can feel justified for constant doom and gloom and negative opinions. It’s been pointed out by many over the past couple years. This just isn’t a place to have football discussions anymore because of the constant hyperbole. If you don’t subscribe to “Bryce Young is the worst QB ever who can’t throw the ball further than 5 yards and is the reason why we lose any game we lose and doesn’t help in any game we win”, then you are labeled a Bryce Young Stan. 
    • if you believe he is watching every NFL game.....every week.....go right ahead.  I get it, he said something you like.  But that's like believing the talking heads on the ESPN shows are watching all the games.  You think Stephen A is watching the Panthers every Sunday too?  If Stephen A needs to go on First Take he certainly can pretend like he has watched every snap any player on the roster has taken lol.   No one is that isn't a Panther fan has been watching the 9-25 career go down every Sunday.  Or even a lot of Sunday's.  You know who knows more about Bryce Young than Long? The collective huddle.  What they are reviewing is stat sheets, highlights and in summaries.  It's an old formula lol.   
×
×
  • Create New...